NRL 360

Rothfield and crawley make Kent seem like a genius. Crawley is a dribbler but these guys who haven't got the brain to think critically just fall into groupthink because it is convenient. But until we win games we are easy targets.
 
The year that we do hit our straps and make the semi's these knobends, especially Matt Johns, will be climbing over each other to get on the bandwagon. Think back to Matty Johns in 2005- that try hard imbecile was up the playing groups' arse further than a Jason Stevens wedgie.
 
@ said:
The year that we do hit our straps and make the semi's these knobends, especially Matt Johns, will be climbing over each other to get on the bandwagon. Think back to Matty Johns in 2005- that try hard imbecile was up the playing groups' arse further than a Jason Stevens wedgie.

If i had a dollar for every time he said that we played with arrogance when Marshall was in the team, i'd be a rich man. As much as i'm not a Robbie fan, i laugh every time i think back at the time Johns ambushed him about his relationship with Marshall. As i said, tries to be hard hitting, the man not afraid to ask the tough questions and comes off like a try hard.
 
@ said:
Rothfield and crawley make Kent seem like a genius. Crawley is a dribbler but these guys who haven't got the brain to think critically just fall into groupthink because it is convenient. But until we win games we are easy targets.

Rothfield is lower than pond scum. Only one that ever surpassed him IMO was Bourbon Bec.
 
Back in the early 70s I was in my late teens/early twenties and I would buy 4 papers a day during footy season and hang off every Tigers headline, but it was funny than you actually had some quality sports writers. Guys like Geoff Prenter,Mike Gibson,Ian Heads and Alan Clarkeson come to mind, not like the trash bin stuff we get now. Danny Wieldler and Rothfield are not on the same page as the four I mentioned.
 
hi supercoach-
yeah journalism was different in those days.- just the facts and some eloquent description of a game and readers were happy.
now its one upmanship trying to outdo the next journalist with sensationalist statements .newcastle won one game last year and have conveniently escaped media condemnation throughout the past 18 months.

anyway,some wins for the wests tigers will change all that of course.
 
@ said:
Rothfield and crawley make Kent seem like a genius. Crawley is a dribbler but these guys who haven't got the brain to think critically just fall into groupthink because it is convenient. But until we win games we are easy targets.

I've never watched the show, so I was just wondering do they target teams like Newcastle and the Warriors? Because they are perennial losers with problems as well. Or is it only just us? And if so, I have to ask why?
 
@ said:
@ said:
Rothfield and crawley make Kent seem like a genius. Crawley is a dribbler but these guys who haven't got the brain to think critically just fall into groupthink because it is convenient. But until we win games we are easy targets.

I've never watched the show, so I was just wondering do they target teams like Newcastle and the Warriors? Because they are perennial losers with problems as well. Or is it only just us? And if so, I have to ask why?

Well, from my perspective, the Wests Tigers are a team that is just popular with the ordinary fan base, and even more so with their fans.

This is evident if you listen to CEO Pascoe where he states that our off the field sponsor support is at an all time high, and getting better/bigger by the month.
We are seen as a great product/vehicle with a booming fan exposure.
Our fan memberships are growing by the year.

And so far as the media goes, going back years, anything Wests Tigers was all of a sudden prime time/lead story/centre spread - because people read all the news, sensational or otherwise; our popularity translated to their greater sales, interest, and readership numbers.
And for the media types - more and more ratings!
And still does.

Wests Tigers are viewed as immensely attractive. Full stop.
 
Ben Ikin is a champion at playing the fall-guy for all the crap that comes from the mouths of Kent, Rothfield and others.

In reality, he instigates it with his questions and that smug, innocent face. And, deliberately so. He knows it. He likes to promote controversy. It's tabloid TV. Utter crap. Ikin is a wanker of the highest order. The reaction of Johns, Tallis, Hindmarsh et al shows how little regard he is held within league circles.
 
@ said:
Ben Ikin is a champion at playing the fall-guy for all the crap that comes from the mouths of Kent, Rothfield and others.

In reality, he instigates it with his questions and that smug, innocent face. And, deliberately so. He knows it. He likes to promote controversy. It's tabloid TV. Utter crap. Ikin is a wanker of the highest order. The reaction of Johns, Tallis, Hindmarsh et al shows how little regard he is held within league circles.

I'm not saying you're wrong but I'm not exactly enamoured of the trio you mention either…
 
@ said:
Ben Ikin is a champion at playing the fall-guy for all the crap that comes from the mouths of Kent, Rothfield and others.

In reality, he instigates it with his questions and that smug, innocent face. And, deliberately so. He knows it. He likes to promote controversy. It's tabloid TV. Utter crap. Ikin is a wanker of the highest order. **The reaction of Johns, Tallis, Hindmarsh et al shows how little regard he is held within league circles.**

Not sure what this means.
 
Just while we're on the subject of that drunk old crook Rothfield, does anyone remember the story about the Roosters throwing a game against the Cowboys back in 2009? I'm pasting the SMH article from the time below as a reminder. Anyway, the brothel mentioned in the story (classy!) was owned by notorious punter Eddie Hayson, it was reported more recently. And of course as we found out last year Rothfield has been in Hayson's pocket for years - a fact which Rothfield got suspended (though only when it became public) but astonishingly not sacked.

Anyway, it's funny that this Roosters match fixing story never got any traction at all - I mean, consider the hoo ha about Simona's misbehaviour and compare that with pretty strong evidence that several players on the same outright threw a game. And isn't it even more funny that none of the lead reporting came from the Telegraph - for which one would have thought it would be absolutely ideal material.

Surely there couldn't be a relationship between the Telegraph's chief league writer's association with the gambling/sex trade identity connected with this incident and the fact that said Telegraph never really got interested in the story?

Eamonn Duff, Jessica Halloran and Jacquelin Magnay | September 26, 2009

THE Sydney Roosters are bracing for a police investigation into an alleged betting scam surrounding the rugby league club's last home game of the season.
A bitter split has emerged at the eastern suburbs club over the circumstances of the round 26 game between the Roosters and the North Queensland Cowboys at the Sydney Football Stadium.
Bookmakers suspended betting three times before the game after a splurge of bets backed the Cowboys to win by more than 13 points. Extraordinarily, there was little interest in a straight Cowboys win.
The Herald is aware of one punter who outlaid $1500 after hearing, through Roosters associates, that a 13-point-plus loss was ''a sure thing''. He cashed in after the Roosters surrendered a 16-0 half-time lead to lose 32-16.
In the weeks since the September 6 game, players have been pointing fingers at each other and ostracising some teammates.
They are furious that a small group of Roosters ''celebrated'' the loss by visiting a brothel and enjoying the free services of prostitutes.
One player openly accused a teammate of getting some kind of kickback. ''I'm aware that several of the players have been up there [to the brothel] on a weekly basis throughout the year.
''On occasions they are receiving free services. I don't know why or how that works. Why you would want to involve yourself in those types of circles when you are a professional sportsman, I do not know.''
The player told the Herald he was stunned by claims within the club that results were being manipulated. But on reflection, he noted there was one player ''who would do it'', adding several others were young and impressionable. ''Now, looking back, I can't say that it didn't happen.''
Questions have been raised about several games but it is the circumstances surrounding the final home game that has everyone talking.
On the morning of the match, The Sun-Herald revealed that the nation's biggest sports agency, TAB Sportsbet, had suspended betting because of the weight of money on the Cowboys winning by more than 13 points.
''We've got a lot of worries about the betting activity on this game,'' a TAB spokesman, Glenn Munsie, said at the time.
Sources close to the club claim there has been an arrangement in place for several years involving a Roosters scout who offers to supplement the wages of younger players with bonus payments in order to aid exotic bets.
The source said that because those requests were not intended to alter the end result (rather influencing the losing margins or the half-time result), it was easier to draw the youngsters in.

''It's been happening for years. You can take it as being 120 per cent,'' he said.
The Roosters chief executive, Steve Noyce, said if every rumour in the code was investigated it would be a full-time job and that was not really the club's function.
''Brothels are legal. I am not aware of any specific allegation that any Roosters people are owed favours,'' he said. ''The bookies were stung and suddenly the talk is that players are throwing games.''
Under NRL rules it is illegal for players and officials to be involved in betting. It is also incumbent on anyone with information to come forward.
The NRL chief executive, David Gallop, said the NRL had initiated some early inquiries about the match - the only time it had done so all season - but did not have sufficient information to launch an investigation.
''If there was information, of course we would look at it and we would expect co-operation from the authorities.''
NSW police are adamant that nobody within their ranks has officially contacted the club and that a complaint from the public has not been lodged.
But the Herald understands at least one senior Roosters official has received a phone call from someone claiming to be from the police and warning them that players could be quizzed.
 
Back
Top