NRL 360

It's sometimes best to ignore what's said in the media.There will always be individuals—whether it be managers or journalists—attempting to manipulate viewers/readers/listeners with agendas that aim to turn people against the club (its personnel or players). Take the Galvin situation for example, it's only created drama that has put some fans offside with he and his family. People like Isaac Moses know what they're doing.He orchestrated significant attention towards the club to paint it in a negative light to use as leverage.

So no disrespect intended, but fans should realise these are strategic maneuvers to influence perceptions. Once controversy is sparked, they've achieved their goal.
 
supercoach said:
Don’t have a problem with NRL 360 because I don’t watch the crap. It’s all scripted rubbish, put together to create drama. It’s a format they have used since day one, very similar to a reality Tv production.
Click to expand...

I don't have a problem with 360 in essence, what i do have a problem with is elements within the show having clear negative agenda's against us. When Braith is one of our most objective panelists towards us thats concerning. I can see why Richo had a swipe.
 
Lauren said:
It's sometimes best to ignore what's said in the media. There will always be individuals—whether it be managers or journalists—attempting to manipulate viewers/readers/listeners with agendas that aim to turn people against the club (its personnel or players). Take the Galvin situation for example, it's only created drama that has put some fans offside.
People like Isaac Moses know what they're doing. He's orchestrated significant attention towards Galvin and his family.

So no disrespect intended, but it's a strategic maneuver to influence perceptions and once it sparks controversy, they've achieved their goal.
Click to expand...
We’ve done that for years Lauren . It’s gotten us nowhere. We tried the friendship route , we tried ignoring them , we’ve tried positive spin.
If I owned the tigers , and I had the coin , I would refuse to do fox media . I wouldnt let my players be interviewed , I wouldn’t let them do thier shows , I’d make a punt during media scrums to ask who the fox media members were when they asked questions , then make a point to say we arnt talking to you .
The last time we did a fox media blackout they backed off .
The issue would be the fines that the nrl would impose . But if you could afford it , you’d do it .
And to make it even more exponential I’d give channel 9 all access to the club , as a counter point .
Sure the spin would go into overdrive , but when it’s well known that there’s a fox media blackout for the club, any news that came out of them would therefore be fake , and whilst they could produce fake news for a bit , inevitably the number 1 source for nrl viewership and clicks re. The wests tigers , not being available , they would have to succumb.
It’s the scorched earth approach . And you’d need the money and power of a Richo type to achieve it , but it would definitely put the cat amongst the pigeons . And shift the initiative back towards the club.
Because at the moment 360 and the scum at DT have the initiative.
For me I would get real personal as well , call them by thier names in media scrums. Be specific on the lies they told in front of the scrums and hijack them , deliberately hold the meetings on private land to make a point of removing them from the premise etc. I would do everything within my power to undermine thier credibility .
 
Rusty said:
Funny... no bad press about us tonight 🙂
Well not really. LOL
Click to expand...

Braith roasted Buzz, had him uncomfortable. You
can tell that he's tight with Benji. Buzz swore he had
a source call him INSIDE the dressing rooms saying
he could hear Galvin say he wanted out 'to all that
would listen', what an absolute crock of shit haha
 
If Rothfield was telling the truth, he would have been on the front foot. Claiming an "anonymous source" is journo speak for I made it up. Time for Buzz to hang 'em up, and let someone else have a go.
 
If you read between the lines, going back to 360 episodes from late last season when Scott Fulton was first brought to the club, it sounded like Braith was already predicting Lachlan Illias was on the outter with Souths and was keen for him tn sign with us.
I remember the episodes after we had signed Latu Fainu and then Jayden Sullivan, Braith wasn’t happy.
I know Ilias has had his struggles, but I suppose you ask the question, would he have been a better signing on what likely would have been a far less contract than what we signed Sullivan for ?
Obviously the rapid emergence of Galvin means Sullivan isn’t wanted and not really any need for Ilias.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was pretty common knowledge that to get the fainus Benji had to agree to Sullivan . And drew the line with schuster .
You could say showing loyalty to Naden was a mistake , but all the rest of it….. I think is lies . Didn’t Old mate Fulton run to Pascoe and Lee every time he didn’t get his own way .
He also would have had us pay AFB 1.2 mil . I mean I like AFB but not for 1.2 and he hardly strikes me as someone who would come here and not mail it in. I wouldn’t exactly call him a leader of men !
I think this is all plausible deniability , and borderline manipulation of the truth .
Benji was definitely having to pick his battles on which wins he was going to have and not .
Like the Sezer deal , felt like he had to concede others for Fulton . I think Fulton only had himself to blame for his reputation, the goings on here solidified an already quiet rumour that he was in fact a myth . And a giant dickhead to boot .
Despite his dad’s mates going into bat for him .
 
Fish88 said:
Watching Braith tear buzz apart tonight was great viewing . As much as I’m not a Braith fan, he at least has some clout and pulls buzz up on his absolute agenda against us and his support of Isaac Moses and Fulton. Buzz went to water
Click to expand...
You know I’ve hardly ever watched that show, but I must admit I would’ve paid to see that 😂
 
Lestronge said:
I thought it was pretty common knowledge that to get the fainus Benji had to agree to Sullivan . And drew the line with schuster .
You could say showing loyalty to Naden was a mistake , but all the rest of it….. I think is lies . Didn’t Old mate Fulton run to Pascoe and Lee every time he didn’t get his own way .
He also would have had us pay AFB 1.2 mil . I mean I like AFB but not for 1.2 and he hardly strikes me as someone who would come here and not mail it in. I wouldn’t exactly call him a leader of men !
I think this is all plausible deniability , and borderline manipulation of the truth .
Benji was definitely having to pick his battles on which wins he was going to have and not .
Like the Sezer deal , felt like he had to concede others for Fulton . I think Fulton only had himself to blame for his reputation, the goings on here solidified an already quiet rumour that he was in fact a myth . And a giant dickhead to boot .
Despite his dad’s mates going into bat for him .
Click to expand...
He brought half of Tartaks stable here and now wants to play “wasn’t me”. Please.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 529 (members: 34, guests: 495)
Back
Top