@Moh said in [NRL bans the Australian anthem from SoO series](/post/1254886) said:
Lol wow....
Ah well, the old NRL would have just sat with the wrong decision.
It was the correct decision, now reversed due to Morrison's intervention (according to Radio National at 6pm). How despicable is that man?
If it's played, I hope those players for whom it has absolutely no meaning at all can show that by their actions. Then wait for the pile-on from Murdoch etc. Won't that be fun!!!
What about the people who the anthem has meaning for? Are they meant to miss out?
Such is the debate....
Fine, but let those for whom it has no meaning politely refrain, or even better, show how they feel.
The original decision was the correct decision, due to the controversial nature of the anthem for many who will be playing SOO.
It's meaningless, as is SOO itself, other than a cash cow for Ch9 and the NRL/ARL. It's confected rubbish. It's an insult that anyone would consider it being important enough for a national anthem to be played!
Are they objecting to the anthem itself, the countries history, the current situation.
Object, protest, boycott, ban, cancel no solutions forthcoming. What happens when one group puts forward a solution that is unpalatable to another or multiple groups?
Do you seriously believe that the spectacle of SOO (such as it is) will be diminished if there is no playing/singing of the National Anthem? Is it that flimsy a concept? Is it that superficial and anything other than a TV product and money grab through advertising?