Love technical feedback because I never played.
I respect your experience but if you watched the maggiies every week when they were trying to boot them out in 83, 84 when they were totally not telivised that's another level.
The consistency and application of their decisions alternatively applied for the same clubs between game breaking incidents as well as one sided bias re penalties, 6 agains and speed of the ruck is masterly in it's execution.
I know they are both inconsistent and incompetent.
Obstruction will always be debated. Some like black and white. Some like to call it if a defender is impeded. I like black and white because the defenders either side and all the way out to the winger react to those around them in a defensive line. You can’t just look at the guys directly involved in the play.
Yes the answers you seek are in the team list thread
Yes black and white is the only way to view obstructions.
Pretty much. There’s zero evidence to suggest they cheat. That’s emotions clouding people’s judgement.
Albo would have given the kid a copy of New Race by Radio Birdman and told him to take heed when he is old enough to vote.
Its not blurry at all - you take the ball on the inside shoulder and pass the ball when behind the man and its obstruction. You need glasses if you think he passed the ball while he was still on the inside shoulder.
Tackles better than John Howard bowls.
Lol I had a chat with Hindy and fletch when I was up there at the pub, man they go absolutely hard on the drink. Matty johns and his wife were there also
It is blurry, just like a forward pass. You would need a perfect angle to see if he passed the ball from exactly behind the player or he went past the decoy's outside shoulder- hence I'd be happy with whatever the ref ruled on-field.
