NRL Rd 2...*spoilers*

A rule that I didn't know about until 1 year ago that wingers can take the ball into touch even when it's rolling if they have their foot outside.
 
I hate watching Parramatta play, always playing for the crushers, 6 again, high tackle etc.. just play football
 
@balmainjnr said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316680) said:
Not sure why JAC was penalised there? Was it for a terrible kick?

Ball carrying arm touched the ground so it's held, can't drag him out after that.
 
@tig_prmz said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316679) said:
I hate watching Parramatta play, always playing for the crushers, 6 again, high tackle etc.. just play football

I dunno, I wouldn’t mind some of their go forward. They are a good team, especially compared to us.
 
Why do the broadcasters pump fake crowd noise through there audio at Bankwest ?

I doubt they’d be 16,000 at the game but it sounds like a 40,000 crowd .

So fake .
 
@jc99 said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316681) said:
@balmainjnr said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316680) said:
Not sure why JAC was penalised there? Was it for a terrible kick?

Ball carrying arm touched the ground so it's held, can't drag him out after that.

Stupid rule IMO . Was barely held
 
@spud_murphy said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316682) said:
@tig_prmz said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316679) said:
I hate watching Parramatta play, always playing for the crushers, 6 again, high tackle etc.. just play football

I dunno, I wouldn’t mind some of their go forward. They are a good team, especially compared to us.

100%
 
@spud_murphy said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316682) said:
@tig_prmz said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316679) said:
I hate watching Parramatta play, always playing for the crushers, 6 again, high tackle etc.. just play football

I dunno, I wouldn’t mind some of their go forward. They are a good team, especially compared to us.

Average 1-7 barring one or two

But their forward pack is probably top 4 material
 
@speed2burn said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316684) said:
@jc99 said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316681) said:
@balmainjnr said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316680) said:
Not sure why JAC was penalised there? Was it for a terrible kick?

Ball carrying arm touched the ground so it's held, can't drag him out after that.

Stupid rule IMO . Was barely held

Great rule, tackle was completed.
 
@mike said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316688) said:
@speed2burn said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316684) said:
@jc99 said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316681) said:
@balmainjnr said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316680) said:
Not sure why JAC was penalised there? Was it for a terrible kick?

Ball carrying arm touched the ground so it's held, can't drag him out after that.

Stupid rule IMO . Was barely held

Great rule, tackle was completed.

Well gutho was on the ground for half a second Max

I don’t consider that tackle completed. If gutho was able to get up it would have been play on, so why can’t the defender keep dragging him out?
 
@hobbo1 said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316659) said:
@jc99 said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316658) said:
Storm have become one of my favourite teams to watch the last 2-3 years just footy wise. So many entertaining players and characters in their team at the moment

I don’t mind watching the Storms ..
Especially now scam Smith has gone !

Yeah, can actually cheer them to beat parra filth
 
@speed2burn said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316689) said:
@mike said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316688) said:
@speed2burn said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316684) said:
@jc99 said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316681) said:
@balmainjnr said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316680) said:
Not sure why JAC was penalised there? Was it for a terrible kick?

Ball carrying arm touched the ground so it's held, can't drag him out after that.

Stupid rule IMO . Was barely held

Great rule, tackle was completed.

Well gutho was on the ground for half a second Max

I don’t consider that tackle completed. If gutho was able to get up it would have been play on, so why can’t the defender keep dragging him out?

The ball carrying arm was on the ground with the tackler still in contact with him. Tackle complete. It’s been like that since 1908.
 
@mike said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316694) said:
@speed2burn said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316689) said:
@mike said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316688) said:
@speed2burn said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316684) said:
@jc99 said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316681) said:
@balmainjnr said in [NRL Rd 2\.\.\.\*spoilers\*](/post/1316680) said:
Not sure why JAC was penalised there? Was it for a terrible kick?

Ball carrying arm touched the ground so it's held, can't drag him out after that.

Stupid rule IMO . Was barely held

Great rule, tackle was completed.

Well gutho was on the ground for half a second Max

I don’t consider that tackle completed. If gutho was able to get up it would have been play on, so why can’t the defender keep dragging him out?

The ball carrying arm was on the ground with the tackler still in contact with him. Tackle complete. It’s been like that since 1908.

I’m not saying it was the wrong call, I just don’t personally agree with it haha
 
Back
Top