Official - Josh Reynolds Signs Megathread

[stevied]

Tigers five -eighth signing best result;
1\. Martin
2\. Lolohea
3\. Reynolds (but not $750k per year!)
Tigers fullback signing best result
1\. Mitchell
2\. Edwards
3\. Watson

 

[TJ21]

Tigers five -eighth signing best result;
1\. Martin
2\. Lolohea
3\. Reynolds (but not $750k per year!)
Tigers fullback signing best result
1\. Mitchell
2\. Edwards
3\. Watson

Reynolds is then only player off contract. I still cant see these teams releasing that talent

 

[Glennb]

Tigers five -eighth signing best result;
1\. Martin
2\. Lolohea
3\. Watson
Tigers fullback signing best result
1\. Mitchell
2\. Edwards

Fixed that for you :wink:

None of those guys are off contract but also none of them (except maybe Martin) are going to get a go where they are. They must be a chance.

 

[stevied]

Tigers five -eighth signing best result;
1\. Martin
2\. Lolohea
3\. Reynolds (but not $750k per year!)
Tigers fullback signing best result
1\. Mitchell
2\. Edwards
3\. Watson

Reynolds is then only player off contract. I still cant see these teams releasing that talent

But most of the teams involved do need to offload players while there seems to be mutual player/ club dissatisfaction involving Martin and Mitchell. I agree that some scenarios seem unlikely. I'm merely outlining the best outcomes for us.

 

[stevied]

Tigers five -eighth signing best result;
1\. Martin
2\. Lolohea
3\. Watson
Tigers fullback signing best result
1\. Mitchell
2\. Edwards

Fixed that for you :wink:

None of those guys are off contract but also none of them (except maybe Martin) are going to get a go where they are. They must be a chance.

I concur but, then, I tend to be an optimist….Yes, I'd prefer Watson to Reynolds, despite his lack of experience.

 

[TJ21]

Tigers five -eighth signing best result;
1\. Martin
2\. Lolohea
3\. Reynolds (but not $750k per year!)
Tigers fullback signing best result
1\. Mitchell
2\. Edwards
3\. Watson

Reynolds is then only player off contract. I still cant see these teams releasing that talent

But most of the teams involved do need to offload players while there seems to be mutual player/ club dissatisfaction involving Martin and Mitchell. I agree that some scenarios seem unlikely. I'm merely outlining the best outcomes for us.

True. I would love TMM and Latrell, you are definitely right would be best results if we could get it done

 

[earl]

How can you offer him more than brooks does my head in.

I don't mind him but I don't think he is value for money. He does dumb stuff a lot as well.

 

[cqtiger]

Having a 5/8 who can tackle is a good outcome

 

[TYGA]

Reynolds right now is a better player than TMM.
He costs twice as much and has no upside but experienced and plays with energy. I'd take TMM better value for money.

 

[851]

Reynolds right now is a better player than TMM.
He costs twice as much and has no upside but experienced and plays with energy. I'd take TMM better value for money.

Me too, TMM has a huge upside, long term (age) and short term (cost).

 

[newtiger]

Tigers five -eighth signing best result;
1\. Martin
2\. Lolohea
3\. Watson
Tigers fullback signing best result
1\. Mitchell
2\. Edwards

Fixed that for you :wink:

None of those guys are off contract but also none of them (except maybe Martin) are going to get a go where they are. They must be a chance.

I concur but, then, I tend to be an optimist….Yes, I'd prefer Watson to Reynolds, despite his lack of experience.

Depending where the cap eventually ends up some clubs might not have a choice but to off load players.

 

[newtiger]

Reynolds right now is a better player than TMM.
He costs twice as much and has no upside but experienced and plays with energy. I'd take TMM better value for money.

Me too, TMM has a huge upside, long term (age) and short term (cost).

TMM and spend the cap money saved on a forward.

 

[Bob]

Reynolds would be great.
Different playing style to brooks
Great defence ( less defensive targets for opp)
Commands respect from umpires
Experienced at controlling games
Would be a big enough name to attract others
\
\
All things that TMM would not provide next season.

I wouldn't mind TMM at fullback ( I would also be a fan of noffa there too. Competition for spots is great especially if the all have utility value and can fit it the 17 somewhere.)

 

[Sully]

No thanks.

Whilst he has passion and effort he would not be the structured 5/8 we need.TMM would be my choice

 

[southerntiger]

What makes people think TMM can play fullback?

To my knowledge he never played there at NYC or Schoolboy level.

Is he good under the high ball? Can he cop a hit running back? Is his positioning good?

 

[innsaneink]

Id love to be able to cheer for a grub

 

[Tweed_Tiger]

Id love to be able to cheer for a grub

we do lack a grub with some fire on the field

 

[tigerap]

Big no to Reynolds especially the money being reported. Tmm is a better option

 

[Geo]

What makes people think TMM can play fullback?

To my knowledge he never played there at NYC or Schoolboy level.

Is he good under the high ball? Can he cop a hit running back? Is his positioning good?

I blame Fantasy League mate…

 

[Chicken_Faced_Killa]

Id love to be able to cheer for a grub

Agree. I really don't get people wanting a team of clean skins. We need a bit of grub