Our All time team

T

tigerlogic

New member
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
1,024
1- Hodgson
2- Tuiaki
3- Simona
4- Lawrence
5- Richards
6- Marshall
7- Brooks
8- Woods
9- Farah
10- Galloway
11- Ellis
12- Fulton
13- Galea/Blair

Obviously many of these choices are debatable, but a lot of the players who would make our all time team are with us now, good things ahead of us IMO

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Most choices are pretty obvious (eg Hodgson, Farah, Ellis). I would still have Prince over Brooks, but hopefully that will change given enough games. Oh, and I almost missed that you picked Blair. That's just for giggles, right?
 
Hodgson (I would expect he'll be replaced by Tedesco in coming years)
Tuiaki
Simona
Lawrence
Richards
Benji
Prince (to be replaced by Brooks in a year or three)
Lanfranchi
Ellis
Dwyer
Galloway
Farah
Woods
 
Simona ahead of Paul Whatuira? i think not. Simona is a talent, but not deserving to be mentioned in any kind of greatest WT's team at this stage. Hell id even have John Wilson ahead of Simona. The most under rated player to ever pull on a WT's jersey
 
This is way easier that the worst Team of Tigers ever.

The Tigers have had enough duds to fill 7 teams
 
GeeZe we have a very short history

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@tigerlogic said:
1- Hodgson
2- Tuiaki
3- Simona
4- Lawrence
5- Richards
6- Marshall
7- Brooks
8- Woods
9- Farah
10- Galloway
11- Ellis
12- Fulton
13- Galea/Blair

Obviously many of these choices are debatable, **but a lot of the players who would make our all time team are with us now, good things ahead of us IMO**

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
Click to expand...

You can't pick an all time best side with players cos they have potential, i.e Simona, Brooks, Tedesco and even to a lesser extent Woods. Its disrespectful to the guys who have come before, guys like Whatuira, Skandalis, O'Neill etc

Picking an all time best side isn't about picking a side with guys who have potential, its about picking those who have already reached their potential. If you want to throw those guys in in a couple yrs so be it, but for now this team is for guys who have come before them and achieved more then they have.

Only player in the current side that has an undisputed claim is Farah.
 
1 Hodgson
2 Richards
3 Lawrence
4 Whatuira
5 Tuiaki
6 Marshall
7 Prince ©
8 Woods
9 Farah
10 Keefy
11 Ellis
12 Payten
13 Gibbs
 
1\. Hodgson
2\. Tuiaki
3\. Whatuira
4\. Lawrence
5\. Richards
6\. Marshall
7\. Prince
8\. Scandalis
9\. Farah
10\. Payten
11\. O'Neill - captain
12\. Fulton
13\. Galea

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Defensively in my opinion Gibbs has to be in your starting 13

If you had a bench mine would be

14 Laffranchi
15 Skandallis
16 Dwyer
17 Buckets
 
These things are so subjective, but mine is very different to alot of these.

1\. Hodgson
2\. Richards
3\. Terry Hill
4\. Chris Lawrence
5\. Tuiaki
6\. Benji
7\. Prince
13\. B Galea
12\. LaFranchi
11\. Ellis
10\. Woods
9\. Robbie
8\. Skandalis
 
I put all 13 players as Fitzhenry. The ultimate team.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@tigerlogic said:
1- Hodgson
2- Tuiaki
3- Simona
4- Lawrence
5- Richards
6- Marshall
7- Brooks
8- Woods
9- Farah
10- Galloway
11- Ellis
12- Fulton
13- Galea/Blair

Obviously many of these choices are debatable, **but a lot of the players who would make our all time team are with us now, good things ahead of us IMO**

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

You can't pick an all time best side with players cos they have potential, i.e Simona, Brooks, Tedesco and even to a lesser extent Woods. Its disrespectful to the guys who have come before, guys like Whatuira, Skandalis, O'Neill etc

Picking an all time best side isn't about picking a side with guys who have potential, its about picking those who have already reached their potential. If you want to throw those guys in in a couple yrs so be it, but for now this team is for guys who have come before them and achieved more then they have.

Only player in the current side that has an undisputed claim is Farah.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I understand that but think some of the players with potential are still already better than past players who lived up to potential

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
1\. Hodgson
2\. Richards
3\. Whatuira
4\. Lawrence
5\. Tuiaki
6\. Marshall
7\. Prince
8\. Woods
9\. Farah
10\. Skandalis
11\. Ellis
12\. Laffranchi
13\. Galea

14\. Galloway
15\. Payten
16\. Fulton
17\. Walker
 
1\. Hodgson
2\. Tuiaki
3\. Lawrence
4\. Ayshford
5\. Richards
6\. Marshall
7\. Prince
8\. Skandalis
9\. Farah
10\. Galloway
11\. Ellis
12\. Fulton
13\. Laffranchi

Went Ayshford over Whatuira. Because he was pivotal to 2010 and 11 which were very successful and at his best was better than Paul by a long way.
 
Any team without galea is kidding:

1\. Hodgson
2\. Tuiaki
3\. Whatiura
4\. Lawrence
5\. Richards
6\. Marshall
7\. Prince
8\. Skandalis
9\. Farah
10\. Galloway
11\. Ellis
12\. Laffranchi
13\. Galea

14\. Gibbs
15\. Senter
16\. Fulton
17\. Payten

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@Goose said:
These things are so subjective, but mine is very different to alot of these.

1\. Hodgson
2\. Richards
3\. Terry Hill
4\. Chris Lawrence
5\. Tuiaki
6\. Benji
7\. Prince
13\. B Galea
12\. LaFranchi
11\. Ellis
10\. Woods
9\. Robbie
8\. Skandalis
Click to expand...

Good call ,forgot about Tezza
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

... and 2 more.
Total: 412 (members: 52, guests: 360)
Forever online: Tigergran, Geo
Back
Top