Player and team stats from tonight

[Nelson]

Found em..and some updated M..

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles (41 Minutes) 103m

9\. Taylor: 9 metres in attack, 1 run, 23 tackles (41 Minutes) 8m

10\. Matulino: 122 metres in attack, 13 runs, 29 tackles (49 Minutes) 143m

11\. Lawrence: 113 metres in attack, 13 runs, 23 tackles (79 Minutes) 132m

12\. Rochow: 49 metres in attack, 8 runs, 29 tackles (49 Minutes) 59m

13\. Eisenhuth: 65 metres in attack, 8 runs, 37 tackles (62 Minutes) 74m

14\. Twal: 78 metres in attack, 11 runs, 28 tackles (41 Minutes) 85m

15\. Liddle: 45 metres in attack, 4 runs, 16 tackles (47 Minutes) 59m

16\. MCK: 60 metres in attack, 7 runs, 18 tackles (46 Minutes) 73m

17\. Sue: 93 metres in attack, 9 runs, 12 tackles (33 Minutes) 93m

A fairly even rotation for the Props minutes wise..I thought Sue and Twal did a terrific job in tandem…playing most of their time together...

Hey Geo- what are the figures at the end?

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles (41 Minutes) **<big>103m</big>**

Metres run by our Forwards Russ..

BTW Eisenhuth was all over Taumalolo all night..2 sides to the game…really nullified him...

Still don't get it Geo - sorry 93 metres in attack and 103 metres in what?

I saw that he was owning Taumalolo in defence and did a great job.

However I figure for a big guy (understand too much defence burns some of the gas) he doesn't make many metres, I am putting it down to technique and I am sure he could learn of Packer and Mats. That would only make him a much more valuable player. Same with Rokko.

I think the second figure (the 103m) is from the updated stats. Most stats services do at least a second pass and revise their stats to make them more accurate.

If Eisenhuth was given the task of shutting down Taumalolo then I'm happy for him to take a few trundling hit ups while putting the bulk of his energy into his defense. We're doing better this season off the back of our energy in defense, we don't need everyone taking surging hit ups all the time. Yes it would be better if he could do everything but not many forwards can and those that do get paid the sort of money Sam Burgess is on…

 

[Geo]

Found em..and some updated M..

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles (41 Minutes) 103m

9\. Taylor: 9 metres in attack, 1 run, 23 tackles (41 Minutes) 8m

10\. Matulino: 122 metres in attack, 13 runs, 29 tackles (49 Minutes) 143m

11\. Lawrence: 113 metres in attack, 13 runs, 23 tackles (79 Minutes) 132m

12\. Rochow: 49 metres in attack, 8 runs, 29 tackles (49 Minutes) 59m

13\. Eisenhuth: 65 metres in attack, 8 runs, 37 tackles (62 Minutes) 74m

14\. Twal: 78 metres in attack, 11 runs, 28 tackles (41 Minutes) 85m

15\. Liddle: 45 metres in attack, 4 runs, 16 tackles (47 Minutes) 59m

16\. MCK: 60 metres in attack, 7 runs, 18 tackles (46 Minutes) 73m

17\. Sue: 93 metres in attack, 9 runs, 12 tackles (33 Minutes) 93m

A fairly even rotation for the Props minutes wise..I thought Sue and Twal did a terrific job in tandem…playing most of their time together...

Hey Geo- what are the figures at the end?

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles (41 Minutes) **<big>103m</big>**

Metres run by our Forwards Russ..

BTW Eisenhuth was all over Taumalolo all night..2 sides to the game…really nullified him...

Still don't get it Geo - sorry 93 metres in attack and 103 metres in what?

I saw that he was owning Taumalolo in defence and did a great job.

However I figure for a big guy (understand too much defence burns some of the gas) he doesn't make many metres, I am putting it down to technique and I am sure he could learn of Packer and Mats. That would only make him a much more valuable player. Same with Rokko.

The figures are the revised and udjusted overnight from willows original figures eg willow had Packer running for 93m after review it went up to 103m same with the rest. ..

 

[Russell]

Hey Geo- what are the figures at the end?

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles (41 Minutes) **<big>103m</big>**

Metres run by our Forwards Russ..

BTW Eisenhuth was all over Taumalolo all night..2 sides to the game…really nullified him...

Still don't get it Geo - sorry 93 metres in attack and 103 metres in what?

I saw that he was owning Taumalolo in defence and did a great job.

However I figure for a big guy (understand too much defence burns some of the gas) he doesn't make many metres, I am putting it down to technique and I am sure he could learn of Packer and Mats. That would only make him a much more valuable player. Same with Rokko.

The figures are the revised and udjusted overnight from willows original figures eg willow had Packer running for 93m after review it went up to 103m same with the rest. ..

Oh! ok - all clear now. Thought I was missing some secret stat that had just been introduced. Thanks.

 

[tonza]

Much more balanced playing times for this game. A few players buggered after playing big minutes last week.

 

[teddy23]

Take out MCK put Benji on the bench and J Rey to 5/8 and that’s the best team we can field imo

MCK has been one of the best the last few weeks. His impact has been impressive

Not going against that but I don’t think you can cut anyone else from the team, and J Rey needs to play

You could cut Marshall?

I think he’s more valuable playing at that 14 role then cutting him, much better option then a second hooker like a Godinet type that’s for sure

 

[Milky]

Take out MCK put Benji on the bench and J Rey to 5/8 and that’s the best team we can field imo

Disagree. Take out Rochow, start Chee Kam and put Benji on the bench.

 

[851]

Take out MCK put Benji on the bench and J Rey to 5/8 and that’s the best team we can field imo

Take out Rochow not MCK

 

[teddy23]

Personally I think Rochow’s defensive efforts would be missed dearly if he was too be cut

 

[happy_tiger]

Found em..and some updated M..

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles (41 Minutes) 103m

9\. Taylor: 9 metres in attack, 1 run, 23 tackles (41 Minutes) 8m

10\. Matulino: 122 metres in attack, 13 runs, 29 tackles (49 Minutes) 143m

11\. Lawrence: 113 metres in attack, 13 runs, 23 tackles (79 Minutes) 132m

12\. Rochow: 49 metres in attack, 8 runs, 29 tackles (49 Minutes) 59m

13\. Eisenhuth: 65 metres in attack, 8 runs, 37 tackles (62 Minutes) 74m

14\. Twal: 78 metres in attack, 11 runs, 28 tackles (41 Minutes) 85m

15\. Liddle: 45 metres in attack, 4 runs, 16 tackles (47 Minutes) 59m

16\. MCK: 60 metres in attack, 7 runs, 18 tackles (46 Minutes) 73m

17\. Sue: 93 metres in attack, 9 runs, 12 tackles (33 Minutes) 93m

A fairly even rotation for the Props minutes wise..I thought Sue and Twal did a terrific job in tandem…playing most of their time together...

Hey Geo- what are the figures at the end?

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles (41 Minutes) **<big>103m</big>**

Metres run by our Forwards Russ..

BTW Eisenhuth was all over Taumalolo all night..2 sides to the game…really nullified him...

Still don't get it Geo - sorry 93 metres in attack and 103 metres in what?

I saw that he was owning Taumalolo in defence and did a great job.

However I figure for a big guy (understand too much defence burns some of the gas) he doesn't make many metres, I am putting it down to technique and I am sure he could learn of Packer and Mats. That would only make him a much more valuable player. Same with Rokko.

They adjust the figures when they rewatch the game , 103 metres would be the adjusted figure

 

[Silentio]

Sauaso Sue's stats don't lie. He had the Cows on the backfoot with over 10 metres per run. It seems like they're using him as an impact forward. Smart tactics by Cleary.

 

[Fibros]

122 for Matulino 💪

In 1/2 a game. And still his strength is his defence, 29 tackles 1/2 a game.

 

[Fibros]

Packer and mautlino were awesome. Then twal and sue really kept that go forward going. If we hold the ball and the forwards are on we will win more games then we lose despite the refs best efforts.

Packer and Mats are a great combo. We need both them on the filed.

 

[Fibros]

Much better contribution from the Pack…

Wish we could still get minutes played Willow....I was surprised how long both Packer and Matulino were off the field...

Completions also back where the should be..

Great team win...

Sue looked shot towards the end of his stint. Was screaming for Mats to come on for Sue.

 

[Fibros]

We certainly dropped when Packerlino went off

My thoughts also. And to add to this I have defended Rochow and had him in my team each week. Many on here posting about his lack of meters in attack. For me Rochow needs a break cuz his defence has fallen away in recent weeks. He is 2nd in missed tackles only behind Maloney.

 

[Seantice]

All well in good but the main stat was 48 missed tackles by us. Jeez we need to improve in this area. Anything over 30 in not ideal let alone 48..

 

[Eye_of_the_Tiger]

Take out MCK put Benji on the bench and J Rey to 5/8 and that’s the best team we can field imo

MCK has been one of the best the last few weeks. His impact has been impressive

Not going against that but I don’t think you can cut anyone else from the team, and J Rey needs to play

Fair Point.

I would move MCK to 12 and have Rochow dropped

 

[colmcd]

Again, a mixture of Foxsports and NRL so there will be descrepancies…

1\. Thompson: 104 metres in attack, 1 try assist, 11 runs, 5 tackles

2\. Nofoaluma: 144 metres in attack, 1 try, 16 runs, 6 tackles

3\. Marsters: 98 metres in attack, 1 line break, 1 try, 1 try assist, 10 runs, 3 tackles

5\. Fonua: 215 metres in attack, 1 line break, 23 runs, 5 tackles (NRL shows 230 metres in attack)

20\. MWZ: 131 metres in attack, 1 try, 2 line breaks, 14 runs, 4 tackles

6\. Marshall: 78 metres in attack, 7 runs, 9 tackles

7\. Brooks: 113 metres in attack (probably higher though), 1 try, 8 runs, 8 tackles

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles

9\. Taylor: 9 metres in attack, 1 run, 23 tackles

10\. Matulino: 122 metres in attack, 13 runs, 29 tackles

11\. Lawrence: 113 metres in attack, 13 runs, 23 tackles

12\. Rochow: 49 metres in attack, 8 runs, 29 tackles

13\. Eisenhuth: 65 metres in attack, 8 runs, 37 tackles (NRL shows 49 tackles)

14\. Twal: 78 metres in attack, 11 runs, 28 tackles

15\. Liddle: 45 metres in attack, 4 runs, 16 tackles

16\. MCK: 60 metres in attack, 7 runs, 18 tackles

17\. Sue: 93 metres in attack, 9 runs, 12 tackles
\
\
Possession: 51%
Completion rate: 88% (37/42)
All run metres: 1799 (1558)
Post contact metres: 621 (538)
Line breaks: 5 (2)
Tackle breaks: 23 (45)
Av set distance: 42.8 (42.1)
Av play the ball speed: 3.18s (3.26s)
Offloads: 9 (7)
Kick metres: 583 (489)
Forced drop outs: 2 (0)
Effective tackles: 86% (89.9%)
Ineffective tackles: 10 (14)
Errors: 7 (15)
Penalties conceded: 5 (5)

Wait, did we have 3 hookers? Dinnit Taylor start as hooker?
9\. Taylor: 9 metres in attack, 1 run, 23 tackles
I am guessing Taylor got knocked out early or something. (sorry missed the game).

15\. Liddle: 45 metres in attack, 4 runs, 16 tackles
16\. MCK: 60 metres in attack, 7 runs, 18 tackles

OK, Glad none of them were Godinet, the guy is batting above his pay grade but still not NRL worthy.

Did Mck play elsewhere? I like the guy but he seems to be outclassed by Liddle.

 

[Geo]

Again, a mixture of Foxsports and NRL so there will be descrepancies…

1\. Thompson: 104 metres in attack, 1 try assist, 11 runs, 5 tackles

2\. Nofoaluma: 144 metres in attack, 1 try, 16 runs, 6 tackles

3\. Marsters: 98 metres in attack, 1 line break, 1 try, 1 try assist, 10 runs, 3 tackles

5\. Fonua: 215 metres in attack, 1 line break, 23 runs, 5 tackles (NRL shows 230 metres in attack)

20\. MWZ: 131 metres in attack, 1 try, 2 line breaks, 14 runs, 4 tackles

6\. Marshall: 78 metres in attack, 7 runs, 9 tackles

7\. Brooks: 113 metres in attack (probably higher though), 1 try, 8 runs, 8 tackles

8\. Packer: 93 metres in attack, 8 runs, 19 tackles

9\. Taylor: 9 metres in attack, 1 run, 23 tackles

10\. Matulino: 122 metres in attack, 13 runs, 29 tackles

11\. Lawrence: 113 metres in attack, 13 runs, 23 tackles

12\. Rochow: 49 metres in attack, 8 runs, 29 tackles

13\. Eisenhuth: 65 metres in attack, 8 runs, 37 tackles (NRL shows 49 tackles)

14\. Twal: 78 metres in attack, 11 runs, 28 tackles

15\. Liddle: 45 metres in attack, 4 runs, 16 tackles

16\. MCK: 60 metres in attack, 7 runs, 18 tackles

17\. Sue: 93 metres in attack, 9 runs, 12 tackles
\
\
Possession: 51%
Completion rate: 88% (37/42)
All run metres: 1799 (1558)
Post contact metres: 621 (538)
Line breaks: 5 (2)
Tackle breaks: 23 (45)
Av set distance: 42.8 (42.1)
Av play the ball speed: 3.18s (3.26s)
Offloads: 9 (7)
Kick metres: 583 (489)
Forced drop outs: 2 (0)
Effective tackles: 86% (89.9%)
Ineffective tackles: 10 (14)
Errors: 7 (15)
Penalties conceded: 5 (5)

Wait, did we have 3 hookers? Dinnit Taylor start as hooker?
9\. Taylor: 9 metres in attack, 1 run, 23 tackles
I am guessing Taylor got knocked out early or something. (sorry missed the game).

15\. Liddle: 45 metres in attack, 4 runs, 16 tackles
16\. MCK: 60 metres in attack, 7 runs, 18 tackles

OK, Glad none of them were Godinet, the guy is batting above his pay grade but still not NRL worthy.

Did Mck play elsewhere? I like the guy but he seems to be outclassed by Liddle.

Liddle came on for Taylor at around the 35min mark …played the rest of the game...Chee-Kam played backrow for Rochow then a bit of Lock when Eisenhuth went off...When Taylor came back on late he played bit in the middle bit on an edge like 5mins...