Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock-On???

You always know its a dodgy decision and the result scripted when replays are never shown. The commentators banged on ad nauseam about the great tackle and the telecast replayed the tackle 125 times but always cut away 2 seconds before the alleged knock on, on all the replays they showed, if it was a legit call the replay would have gone on to show it. Very very convenient for Gee and the NRL every replay cut away in time. It was the first of about 15 dud calls throughout that game that cost the Tigers the result. Anyone excited about the NRLs Parra vs Penrith, All Sydney derby GF they are setting up?
 
I saw a try which was awarded to Newcastle against Manly yesterday. The Newcastle player touched a kick from his team. After the touch went forward in the air without anybody without anybody but the same player re-gathering it in the air and falling with it on the tryline.
 
It's the "interpretation" - it's the vibe of it. It's the Constitution. It's Mabo.. 🙂 that we'll never be able to prove one way or the other. I don't know how you can be hit by a freight train and still be accused of a lose carry..I feel the same way when a ref calls "held" - there are players who get thrown into touch, pass the ball, slip out of tackles..and it all comes down to interpretation. And don't get me started on forward passes and the the ball leaving the arm argument...
 
@Russell said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1175982) said:
Just another "Gee Up"

The guy hates the Tigers more than Perenara and Badger.

Yep
GG nope it Gee Gee

Geenius ref calls
 
@Newton said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1175973) said:
You always know its a dodgy decision and the result scripted when replays are never shown. The commentators banged on ad nauseam about the great tackle and the telecast replayed the tackle 125 times but always cut away 2 seconds before the alleged knock on, on all the replays they showed, if it was a legit call the replay would have gone on to show it. Very very convenient for Gee and the NRL every replay cut away in time. It was the first of about 15 dud calls throughout that game that cost the Tigers the result. Anyone excited about the NRLs Parra vs Penrith, All Sydney derby GF they are setting up?


So it’s a conspiracy and that the tv networks are in on. Riigght
 
At least ansley will be there to dumbfoundedly point at a power point and say it was the correct call or it was 5050 .....

:::

Spoiler Text

:::
 
Tigers should have challenged it. Kikau's hand clearly around the ball on replay, though live you could understand why it was hard to detect.

Especially after getting smashed. Refs always seem keen to rule a dropped ball if there's any kind of bobble after a big hit.
 
@jirskyr said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176107) said:
Tigers should have challenged it. Kikau's hand clearly around the ball on replay, though live you could understand why it was hard to detect.

Especially after getting smashed. Refs always seem keen to rule a dropped ball if there's any kind of bobble after a big hit.


Players have less leeway to complain now they have the option to challenge.
 
@Newtown said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1175992) said:
I saw a try which was awarded to Newcastle against Manly yesterday. The Newcastle player touched a kick from his team. After the touch went forward in the air without anybody without anybody but the same player re-gathering it in the air and falling with it on the tryline.

Yeah I saw that.

I was pretty sure they ruled that was not okay back nearly 100 years ago, when players would run up to the defence, throw the ball over their heads, run around them, and then catch the ball before it hit anyone else.
 
@jirskyr said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176107) said:
Tigers should have challenged it. Kikau's hand clearly around the ball on replay, though live you could understand why it was hard to detect.

Especially after getting smashed. Refs always seem keen to rule a dropped ball if there's any kind of bobble after a big hit.

Just too early in the game to use your challenge. Smart teams know not to use a challenge on a 50/50 call as well. Use the challenge when you definitely know the call was wrong or in the final stages of the game when you've got nothing else to lose by using it.
 
@rah53 said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176121) said:
@jirskyr said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176107) said:
Tigers should have challenged it. Kikau's hand clearly around the ball on replay, though live you could understand why it was hard to detect.

Especially after getting smashed. Refs always seem keen to rule a dropped ball if there's any kind of bobble after a big hit.

Just too early in the game to use your challenge. Smart teams know not to use a challenge on a 50/50 call as well. Use the challenge when you definitely know the call was wrong or in the final stages of the game when you've got nothing else to lose by using it.

Disagree
If your adamant your correct use the challenge ..
But when your captain is church mouse Mbye that’s half the problem.
 
@hobbo1 said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176128) said:
@rah53 said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176121) said:
@jirskyr said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176107) said:
Tigers should have challenged it. Kikau's hand clearly around the ball on replay, though live you could understand why it was hard to detect.

Especially after getting smashed. Refs always seem keen to rule a dropped ball if there's any kind of bobble after a big hit.

Just too early in the game to use your challenge. Smart teams know not to use a challenge on a 50/50 call as well. Use the challenge when you definitely know the call was wrong or in the final stages of the game when you've got nothing else to lose by using it.

Disagree
If your adamant your correct use the challenge ..
But when your captain is church mouse Mbye that’s half the problem.

I did say use it when you definitely know it was the wrong call, which is the same as adamant that you're correct.
If they challenged that in the 1st minute of the game, and the video ref didn't interpret it like we saw it, it's a wasted challenge straight out the gate. We've all seen the video ref interpret things differently to everyone else, eg Jarrod Maxwell, and that was 1 of those kinds of decisions. Not worth the risk early in the game.
 
@hobbo1 said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176128) said:
@rah53 said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176121) said:
@jirskyr said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176107) said:
Tigers should have challenged it. Kikau's hand clearly around the ball on replay, though live you could understand why it was hard to detect.

Especially after getting smashed. Refs always seem keen to rule a dropped ball if there's any kind of bobble after a big hit.

Just too early in the game to use your challenge. Smart teams know not to use a challenge on a 50/50 call as well. Use the challenge when you definitely know the call was wrong or in the final stages of the game when you've got nothing else to lose by using it.

Disagree
If your adamant your correct use the challenge ..
But when your captain is church mouse Mbye that’s half the problem.

We didn't use the challenge, we would have won the challenge, we were immediately 6 points behind, we lost by 7. Seems as good a time as any to use the call, if you think you are right.
 
@jirskyr said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176142) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176128) said:
@rah53 said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176121) said:
@jirskyr said in [Please Explain To Me The Alleged Knock\-On???](/post/1176107) said:
Tigers should have challenged it. Kikau's hand clearly around the ball on replay, though live you could understand why it was hard to detect.

Especially after getting smashed. Refs always seem keen to rule a dropped ball if there's any kind of bobble after a big hit.

Just too early in the game to use your challenge. Smart teams know not to use a challenge on a 50/50 call as well. Use the challenge when you definitely know the call was wrong or in the final stages of the game when you've got nothing else to lose by using it.

Disagree
If your adamant your correct use the challenge ..
But when your captain is church mouse Mbye that’s half the problem.

We didn't use the challenge, we would have won the challenge, we were immediately 6 points behind, we lost by 7. Seems as good a time as any to use the call, if you think you are right.

We could of used the challenge from the start of the match and would of got it right every single bloody time
 
The way the bunker has been handling the captains challenges so far this year, any doubt at all, they go with the ref. So you waste your time unless it’s a clear cut blunder. Mind you even horse head would have ruled in our favour about half dozen times. Terrible ref, but week in and week out the under dogs cop the crap calls
 
Back
Top