jirskyr
Well-known member
Well the NRL can do anything they please in policing the salary cap, but they should not force an opposition's proposed costs onto someone else's salary cap. Terrible idea.Well..they can’t force him not to go …so you are correct there
They can force PNG to record $1.1m on their cap for him even if they paid him less ..the NRL should have done similar for DCE ..
Anyway …like I said it appears Young is not going there now
It's a well-established issue - Tedesco, for example, took much less to join the Roosters. Despite the harm it caused us I cannot accept that the "highest bid" thus denotes the actual salary cap value assigned. It heavily incentivises speculative or disingenuous bidding.
And it's easy to prove by hypothetical. Say Perth Bears struggle next year and decide to go all-out for Nathan Cleary for 2028. They offer him $1.7M. Penrith have the cash but they don't have that kind of space under their salary cap.
Therefore the newest or worst or youngest or cheapest roster in the comp can make speculative high-value plays to, if not attain the target player, cause injury to the incumbent side.