Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here

Status
Not open for further replies.
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Funny, I heard one feminist offer that PC started as a joke. When someone offered a view that wasn't exactly in line with a political theory, they would say "that's not PC".

Your first mistake was listening to a Feminist. Surprise surprise, she was wrong.

She was there, unsure if you were even alive then(I wasn't). I can be certain that you were not hanging around Feminist circles listening to what they were talking about. So why are you talking like an expert when you really know Zero about this… Guessing you heard this off an "expert" like alan jones or tim blair, etc... They have Zero knowledge about most things they talk about and jones lead a premiere Balmain Tigers team to second last! They are lost, don't talk about stuff you really don't know.

@ said:
Political Correctness as we know it originated among the Soviets, was utilised by the Nazis and Mao, and has been a tool of the left to suppress free speech and strangle public conversation ever since.

Its got nothing to do with rudeness or racism. It is a tool to get people with opposing opinions to shut up.

Why go to the effort of cultivating an argument or examining your own opinions, when you can just call someone a Racist or a Homophobe, and end the conversation right there?

And before you disagree with any of the above, i think you're a filthy racist and your homophobic opinions have no place on this forum.

I really wonder if you are a Tigers fan at all? Honestly you post more about politics then the Tigers. Most people here won't care that you mix up Nazis and Soviets borrowing ideas off each other at a time arguably 30ish years before we see the term even mentioned! Saying stuff like that is more ambitious then Warwick Kappa wanting to box Wendell Sailor. As we see the scomo government rush encryption laws to silence us and our right to a private conversation, you say the sillyness above?

Where were you when Wests Tigers fans were booing little johnny howard at the 2005 NRL grand final?

Attacking the man instead of the ball.

Sad little man.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Funny, I heard one feminist offer that PC started as a joke. When someone offered a view that wasn't exactly in line with a political theory, they would say "that's not PC".

Your first mistake was listening to a Feminist. Surprise surprise, she was wrong.

She was there, unsure if you were even alive then(I wasn't). I can be certain that you were not hanging around Feminist circles listening to what they were talking about. So why are you talking like an expert when you really know Zero about this… Guessing you heard this off an "expert" like alan jones or tim blair, etc... They have Zero knowledge about most things they talk about and jones lead a premiere Balmain Tigers team to second last! They are lost, don't talk about stuff you really don't know.

@ said:
Political Correctness as we know it originated among the Soviets, was utilised by the Nazis and Mao, and has been a tool of the left to suppress free speech and strangle public conversation ever since.

Its got nothing to do with rudeness or racism. It is a tool to get people with opposing opinions to shut up.

Why go to the effort of cultivating an argument or examining your own opinions, when you can just call someone a Racist or a Homophobe, and end the conversation right there?

And before you disagree with any of the above, i think you're a filthy racist and your homophobic opinions have no place on this forum.

I really wonder if you are a Tigers fan at all? Honestly you post more about politics then the Tigers. Most people here won't care that you mix up Nazis and Soviets borrowing ideas off each other at a time arguably 30ish years before we see the term even mentioned! Saying stuff like that is more ambitious then Warwick Kappa wanting to box Wendell Sailor. As we see the scomo government rush encryption laws to silence us and our right to a private conversation, you say the sillyness above?

Where were you when Wests Tigers fans were booing little johnny howard at the 2005 NRL grand final?

Attacking the man instead of the ball.

Sad little man.

I'm playing both.
You are saying Nazi's invented a modern phenomenon and shared it with the Soviet Comrades a mere 30 years before it was invented? As above^ it's sillyness, Hitler did not dance with Stalin and George Soros, to create this great term. This is fantasy.

So why would you say such fiction on a football forum? You post in the politics area a lot but arn't mentioning much about Brooks, Lawrence or the Tigers?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Your first mistake was listening to a Feminist. Surprise surprise, she was wrong.

She was there, unsure if you were even alive then(I wasn't). I can be certain that you were not hanging around Feminist circles listening to what they were talking about. So why are you talking like an expert when you really know Zero about this… Guessing you heard this off an "expert" like alan jones or tim blair, etc... They have Zero knowledge about most things they talk about and jones lead a premiere Balmain Tigers team to second last! They are lost, don't talk about stuff you really don't know.

@ said:
Political Correctness as we know it originated among the Soviets, was utilised by the Nazis and Mao, and has been a tool of the left to suppress free speech and strangle public conversation ever since.

Its got nothing to do with rudeness or racism. It is a tool to get people with opposing opinions to shut up.

Why go to the effort of cultivating an argument or examining your own opinions, when you can just call someone a Racist or a Homophobe, and end the conversation right there?

And before you disagree with any of the above, i think you're a filthy racist and your homophobic opinions have no place on this forum.

I really wonder if you are a Tigers fan at all? Honestly you post more about politics then the Tigers. Most people here won't care that you mix up Nazis and Soviets borrowing ideas off each other at a time arguably 30ish years before we see the term even mentioned! Saying stuff like that is more ambitious then Warwick Kappa wanting to box Wendell Sailor. As we see the scomo government rush encryption laws to silence us and our right to a private conversation, you say the sillyness above?

Where were you when Wests Tigers fans were booing little johnny howard at the 2005 NRL grand final?

Attacking the man instead of the ball.

Sad little man.

I'm playing both.
You are saying Nazi's invented a modern phenomenon and shared it with the Soviet Comrades a mere 30 years before it was invented? As above^ it's sillyness, Hitler did not dance with Stalin and George Soros, to create this great term. This is fantasy.

So why would you say such fiction on a football forum? You post in the politics area a lot but arn't mentioning much about Brooks, Lawrence or the Tigers?

And you're failing at both. Badly.

People with IQs in double digits can read for themselves what i wrote. I didn't say the Nazis invented PC, I didn't say that the Nazis and Soviets communicated, and it is a historical fact that "political correctness" was not invented in the 1970's.

So the obvious question that has to be asked is, why are you arguing about something which you evidently know Zero about? That's not an insult, you actually know Zero about this topic.

It took you two days to come up with a reply in which you literally struck out on every point you made. There should be some kind of award for that … maybe the Ahmed Bajouri Trophy For Excellence.
 
Catching up on my Sky news evenings tonight after giving them a miss for a while, as I do like to keep informed of alternative viewpoints, so I normally tune in, though unsurprisingly, very little has changed.

Like their political favourites, along with ones such as a PM that they have to stomach, they were very critical of the students that demonstrated last week, which shows just how little idea they have on community thinking and sentiment. The last time something similar occurred was way back in the seventies against involvement in the Vietnam war. This is another massive event in our recent history, with the kids correct back then, just as they are now. Yet as this momentous action occurred, the Liberals were going against the wishes of their local rank and file to bypass preselection and appoint their chief climate change denier in Craig Kelly, to re-contest the next election.

The coalition have long been a rudderless rabble, particularly so after dumping Turnbull to become totally shambolic and long clearly not governing for their constituents. Instead, simply focussing on themselves and now telling our concerned youngsters that have to live with their lack of action, to stay in school. We have a system of government that allows for the Governer General to intervene and if it was good enough for one to do so back when Fraser was blocking supply, today's circumstances justify similar action.
 
from what I read about political correctness it was initially used by Russian socialists as an insult to or about dogmatic communists who took policies too extreme so became unpractical and cruel.

The NAZIs also used "political correctness" in the opposite direction as a positive tool to describe so called good nationalist tendencies of Aryans. It was used to alienate groups of people that did not follow the politically correct line.

But it evolved over the decades to the sixties and to eighties when people's values changed and it became impolite to exclude or insult people due to race, gender etc.. Now it is a call to be decent to each other, not to unnecessarily hurt, not to separate to be inclusive.

American neo-conservatives in the eighties accused liberals of using the term in the NAZI interpretation to exclude conservatives who kept racist and gender-discrimination values.

From what I have witnessed the more popular divide amongst footie fans is racism and Aborigines.
 
The Liberals and some USA Republicans are worse environmentally-wise than Marg Thatcher. In her maiden speech decades ago she warned of climate change (though have not found in print yet).

The corporate type only want to put current excessive money earning above long term survival and long term money earning. We don't have the right to destroy the environment for the following generations - but we are achieving it at record rates.
 
@ said:
The Liberals and some USA Republicans are worse environmentally-wise than Marg Thatcher. In her maiden speech decades ago she warned of climate change (though have not found in print yet).

The corporate type only want to put current excessive money earning above long term survival and long term money earning. We don't have the right to destroy the environment for the following generations - but we are achieving it at record rates.

Welcome to Capitalism, where enough is never enough, and they do it for their shareholders! :laughing:
 
@ said:
The Liberals and some USA Republicans are worse environmentally-wise than Marg Thatcher. In her maiden speech decades ago she warned of climate change (though have not found in print yet).

The corporate type only want to put current excessive money earning above long term survival and long term money earning. We don't have the right to destroy the environment for the following generations - but we are achieving it at record rates.

https://theecologist.org/2018/oct/17/who-drove-thatchers-climate-change-u-turn, might interest you BBF
 
@ said:
@ said:
The Liberals and some USA Republicans are worse environmentally-wise than Marg Thatcher. In her maiden speech decades ago she warned of climate change (though have not found in print yet).

The corporate type only want to put current excessive money earning above long term survival and long term money earning. We don't have the right to destroy the environment for the following generations - but we are achieving it at record rates.

https://theecologist.org/2018/oct/17/who-drove-thatchers-climate-change-u-turn, might interest you BBF

thanks for that - she seemed to be saying that we have to continue destroying the environment to save it. Solar roof panels manufactured by capitalists were out years before she became a parliamentarian so her back down was unnecessary. "communist/socialist" China is assisting the capitalists by producing panels cheaply that saves the economy as well as environment. I think that in a hundred years time people like Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon and Abbott will be amongst the most despised in history because there was no proper reason for their actions.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
The Liberals and some USA Republicans are worse environmentally-wise than Marg Thatcher. In her maiden speech decades ago she warned of climate change (though have not found in print yet).

The corporate type only want to put current excessive money earning above long term survival and long term money earning. We don't have the right to destroy the environment for the following generations - but we are achieving it at record rates.

https://theecologist.org/2018/oct/17/who-drove-thatchers-climate-change-u-turn, might interest you BBF

thanks for that - she seemed to be saying that we have to continue destroying the environment to save it. Solar roof panels manufactured by capitalists were out years before she became a parliamentarian so her back down was unnecessary. "communist/socialist" China is assisting the capitalists by producing panels cheaply that saves the economy as well as environment. I think that in a hundred years time people like Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon and Abbott will be amongst the most despised in history because there was no proper reason for their actions.

A hundred years?

According to you lot, we won't be here in twenty years,let alone a hundred.

What a wank.

:roll :roll
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
The Liberals and some USA Republicans are worse environmentally-wise than Marg Thatcher. In her maiden speech decades ago she warned of climate change (though have not found in print yet).

The corporate type only want to put current excessive money earning above long term survival and long term money earning. We don't have the right to destroy the environment for the following generations - but we are achieving it at record rates.

https://theecologist.org/2018/oct/17/who-drove-thatchers-climate-change-u-turn, might interest you BBF

thanks for that - she seemed to be saying that we have to continue destroying the environment to save it. Solar roof panels manufactured by capitalists were out years before she became a parliamentarian so her back down was unnecessary. "communist/socialist" China is assisting the capitalists by producing panels cheaply that saves the economy as well as environment. I think that in a hundred years time people like Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon and Abbott will be amongst the most despised in history because there was no proper reason for their actions.

A hundred years?

According to you lot, we won't be here in twenty years,let alone a hundred.

What a wank.

:roll :roll

I have asked you previously what your basis is for not heeding the scientific community's overwhelming consensus that man made climate change is a real threat. I have posted in the past the damage my industry does alone and changes that are taking place worldwide and the significant impact these changes alone will have for reversing the rate at which average global temperatures are rising.

Apart from unsubstantiated garbage that 2GB peddles to you, what is your basis and supporting data for not buying into it?
 
Magpie Col, we will always be here but it is under what conditions and for how many and in what places. Already people at the Sunshine Coast are complaining that it is too hot and come down to Byron to go to the beach!! Typhoons will be much stronger so in coastal areas especially in Asia whole communities will be wiped out like what occurred a few years ago in the Philippines. Cyclones have become much more forceful in the past forty years. Our buildings are not engineered to with stand such forces, our electricity posts may not be even. The same with agriculture and marine lfe, all gets thrown out of sync.
 
I have been on this planet for over seventy years. I have been really hot and really cold. I've seen big floods and big bushfires. When I was a kid it got so hot we would cook eggs on the footpath.

All this stuff is called weather and seasons. Nothing much has changed. I'm all for a cleaner planet. But spare me the lectures from people who tell me that we really are bastards for not believing what they say is gospel.

These are the same zelots who fly around the world in private jets to tell people like me what cretins we are.

So, I ignore them and people like them. And I sleep pretty good at night.
 
You are entitled to your opinion col and i doubt if it will ever change.The evidence of man made climate change is overwhelming and the majority of people can see that.
It wont make a lot of impact on the rest of my life but for people who are alive in the next 30+ years weather will get more extreme and will impact on the food supply for much of the world,
It saddens me greatly knowing than when i die the world will be in a far worse state than when i entered it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top