@magpiecol said:
@pHyR3 said:
@Kul said:
The huge cuts to CSIRO announced today infurriates me.
One of the most highly regarded scientific institutions in the world with a history of proven results, yet Abbott thinks Science Research is "a waste"
Imagine a world without WiFi.
:deadhorse: :deadhorse:
what a backwards idiot…..
how bad were the cuts?
also what happened with the education cuts? is it still money from uni going to schools? doesnt make things that much better...
A little bit of decorum would not go astray. I know that you probably learned your diatribe from the previous rabble but please. As for the cuts, some of you people do not seem to get the fact that with all the spending previously, someone has to pay for it.
More cuts please Mr Abbott starting with the ABC.
I worked for the Federal Government for 20 years and all expense claims went to the relevant section for approval. If they were approved you were paid if they were not approved, then you were not paid.
That section was the same one that approved Ms. Gillard;s claim for an RAAF jet to fly her to a wedding.
You lost big time, get over it.
Make cuts by all means, but not with succesful things like CSIRO
Scientific research programs take years to mature from the initial concept phase through pilot studies, broader testing then finally commerical realisation.
CSIRO isn't some airey-fairy idealist government department. It's a highly successful institute with proven results over decades.
With a budget of $757m (governent funding) it has been able to suppliment its revenue by $548m licensing patents, goods and services developed over years/decades. It is about to embark on its second-tier WiFi patent action against companies like Motorola after easily winning its third-tier court battle, netting BILLIONS. After that it will take on the big guns like Apple, Samsung, etc.
In a time where the economy is weak and the books have to be balanced, why cut off the hand that feeds you? If anything, funding to the CSIRO should be increased, divierting funds from elsewhere if need be.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day…
If cuts need to be made, make them with non-performing things, starting with welfare to bogans.
We waste billions propping up lazy people on the dole. Middle class welfare is a joke.
So, what's better?
Cut funding to smart scientists who are MAKING money, or cut funding to the gronks who live at the pub and on the pokies?