GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143654) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143497) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143495) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143494) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143491) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143478) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143448) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143417) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143369) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143361) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143323) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143321) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143320) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1143309) said:I noticed he called Pelosi a weak person this morning, which is ironic as his inability to accept criticism and his constant lashing out at people/media because of it is the biggest sign that he’s a weak person.
Two things can be true at once. Pelosi is a weak person
Is Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon?
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon has many weaknesses.
I consider Pelosi weak because she does have things she stands for but override them when it is politically expedient, examples being her finally backing AOC's green new deal and blocking the coronavirus emergency bills repeatedly after it was written by a bipartisan committee.
I would agree with you that if you consider someone who is thin skinned and cant cop criticism to be weak, then Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is weak by your classification.
I do not consider him weak in the same definition I gave of Pelosi though. I would think that even most of Trumps many detractors would concede he stands by what he believes in.
You might not be a Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon supporter, but you’re definitely an apologist. You’re more than happy to concede he has flaws, but in a half hearted way, maybe to be diplomatic. You don’t seem to have any complaints about anything he does. The finger pointing goes to everyone else.
Mate, we have gone over this a few times. Im not a supporter or an apologist. As Ive said over and over, Im not Pro-Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon, Im Anti-Anti-Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon. I only really stick my nose in when I think someone is saying stuff that I believe to be bullsh.... Now I stress I dont think people on these forums are making things up, but parroting poor information.
The reason I appear the way I appear to you, as you stated above, is that I ONLY post when I feel this way. If I agree with Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon criticism, I dont step in every time and say "yes you are right". Im pretty much agnostic and my biggest beef isnt with Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon or the left but with the lack of integrity in the debate.
I have zero issues with people not liking Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon, Im not a huge fan and the man provides PLENTY of ammunition for people who dont like him, IMO there is no reason to step outside the bounds of fact.
But to get to the point of the post, GNR, clearly you are not a Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon fan and I said, that is fine and understandable. Do you think that one of his faults is that he doesnt stand up for what he thinks?
Just be upfront, instead of the wishy washy “I’m not pro or anti”because that isn’t true. At the least, you seem unaware of the perception you give arguing in his defence at every turn. If you were truly neutral, you wouldn’t be defending him in every scenario. You want to play devils advocate, but only when it’s in his defence. But use a throwaway line like “he has many weaknesses” as if it makes you impartial.
Why.? Do I need to pick a team? Do you need to know if you are with me or against me? When did you become the arbiter of what is true or not in my political beliefs and opinions.
I am not on the pro Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon team. I’m not on the Orange man bad team. As I said, when I see something I think is egregiously wrong, I point it out. If you think that makes me look like I’m defending Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon I couldn’t give a rats. It’s pretty infrequent that someone in correctly praise Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon in this forum.
I simply post when I see something egregious posted and in every case I back my opinion up with evidence, examples and usually sources. Your response is “pick a side”. I note you haven’t responded to one of my posts with a rebuttal with sources to back up why I’m wrong. I’d welcome that
You don’t have to pick a team at all, I just don’t believe you are sincere. Your posts don’t resemble that of someone who is impartial when you take the same side on every occasion. But anyway.
Which post are you referring to?
What you believe about me isn’t that much of a concern to me. I have explained why my posts take the same side. I’ve been pretty clear about it. Couldn’t really be bothered repeating myself for your benefit.
Which was I referring to? Take your pick. Are the one claiming my posts are insincere. Grab one of my posts that you think is wrong or insincere and disco it with sources. Don’t just challenge me by asking me to pick a side.
You’re going to have to quote me where I asked you to do that, otherwise that’s the narrative you’ve created.
”Just be upfront, instead of the wishy washy “I’m not pro or anti”because that isn’t true.“
This wasn’t you? This isn’t saying I’m either pro or anti Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon and asking me to be upfront about it?
What I said I was, you are obviously not impartial if you are defending him ***at every turn***. There’s nothing wrong with that, just don’t disguise yourself as Switzerland.
GNR, I have explained to you 4 or 5 times now, and it is clear to everyone but you, that I do not defend Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon at every turn, I merely butt in where I think someone is twisting the truth or spouting information where someone else has bent the truth. I have agreed with criticism of Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon since your post but havent stepped in with a "Yeah right!".
You are intentionally ignoring this reason because you ***want*** me to be Pro Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon because then you dont have engage your brain, it makes life easy for you because you can just write me off as a moron and then no longer have to consider my point of view or the examples or evidence I provide (which you *never* do).
You do you your way GNR, Ill do me.
I couldn’t care less if you’re pro or anti. And much of your “evidence” is based on interpretation. There’s rarely a difinitive answer in politics.