Potter signings 4 from 4

@Flippedy said:
@851 said:
@Boonboon2 said:
Lulia wasn't a bad signing - we needed depth in the centres and that has been clear as he has been needed to play a few times. He is also a great trainer, he had played under Mick before so brings some good connectiuon into the squad, etc, etc. A signing especially at low cost isn't always about winning matches on thier own its about being in this case a solid back up and he is much better then the centres at the sharks for example

See cronulla have told Ayshford to look around for a new club,10 games into a 3 year deal,good call from Potter on that one too.

Definitely! I think Blake should consider a career change, his heart just doesn't seem to be in football.

X2 Good call by Mick Potter to move Ayshford on based on his performances in his last few matches. I agree at least Lulia tries!
 
@Boonboon2 said:
Lulia wasn't a bad signing - we needed depth in the centres and that has been clear as he has been needed to play a few times. He is also a great trainer, he had played under Mick before so brings some good connectiuon into the squad, etc, etc. A signing especially at low cost isn't always about winning matches on thier own its about being in this case a solid back up and he is much better then the centres at the sharks for example

I read in Rothfield's column yesterday that Blake Ayshford has been told by Cronulla that he can look for another club to play at.
 
I don't think Reddy was a great loss. I would have preferred we held onto Mitch Brown out of the three mentioned.

I had high hopes for Lulia, especially defence wise. I still think he is a safe backup but he has not performed to my expectation (and I am sure he holds my opinion in high regard!)
 
Back
Top