Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Next man up" has made a rapid rise to becoming Rugby Leagues biggest cliche. Its lost a bit of meaning.Yes but you can only apply it if you have the troops. We have a first 17 of top of the table quality, the available replacements are also quality but only ressies quality. One or two 'next men up' might be sustainable but six in critical spots? Nup. So 'preparing better' for WT, is having better next men up available. We are not that prepared.
Mate at this stage, I’d have a cat or dog refereeing these games. Couldn’t do any worse.Think it’s next man up time for the NRL refereeing department. Did they all hit the Caxton on Thursday night?
Blame that on the bunker bogan, hope when he gets home his dog bites him on the arse.You’ve got to be kidding me. To’o did not have any possession of that ball. What a prick of a ref
For sure it is.True but it's the latter that seems to be the more common reaction.
Maybe that octopus that picked World Cup resultsMate at this stage, I’d have a cat or dog refereeing these games. Couldn’t do any worse.
Hahaha brilliant!Maybe that octopus that picked World Cup results
Yes it does if the coaching staff drill the game plans into them and prepare them adequately."Next man up" has made a rapid rise to becoming Rugby Leagues biggest cliche. Its lost a bit of meaning.
Penrith were always "next man up" because they had freakish talent 3 deep. It doesnt apply so well to career reserve graders.
It should be a red flag to NRL hierarchy ( it won’t be) but blowout scores becoming common is a terrible look for the game.All but one winning margin above 20 points so far this weekend. Not the best look for one of the big weekends for the game. Not sure how they find the depth for 2 more NRL teams
The problem is our ready made replacements are pure plodYes it does if the coaching staff drill the game plans into them and prepare them adequately.
Next man up simply means the replacement knows exactly what’s going on and can seamlessly fit into the established system.
We aren’t expecting the world from them. If they can hold their own and afford the elite guys the chance to play as per program than they have succeeded.
The last few weeks have clearly established thee is a lot more work to be done than most of us realised.
it isnt exactly a new concept and probably not a phrase you hear Bellamy or Bennett say because its just common sense that replacement players know and understand the system they come in to. But if a player isnt good enough, he isnt good enough regardless of how well he knows the systemYes it does if the coaching staff drill the game plans into them and prepare them adequately.
Next man up simply means the replacement knows exactly what’s going on and can seamlessly fit into the established system.
We aren’t expecting the world from them. If they can hold their own and afford the elite guys the chance to play as per program than they have succeeded.
The last few weeks have clearly established thee is a lot more work to be done than most of us realised.
If they are pure plod than that is on the coaching staff and Richo.The problem is our ready made replacements are pure plod
You can have API in and around training as much as you want but Tristan Hope will only ever have the ability of Tristan Hope
Same goes for Mason and the other reserve graders
Richo acknowledged our poor depth when he arrived and only had 18 months of a 3 year plan to fix it.If they are pure plod than that is on the coaching staff and Richo.
Personally I don’t see pure plod. I see guys playing without confidence and direction.
Look we shouldnt expect the nuance of the guys they are replacing, but we should expect that they can perform within the system and enact game plans as per the preparation they’ve been through.
I think we have worked hard on getting our top 17 right, the next stage will be 18-30.If they are pure plod than that is on the coaching staff and Richo.
Personally I don’t see pure plod. I see guys playing without confidence and direction.
Look we shouldnt expect the nuance of the guys they are replacing, but we should expect that they can perform within the system and enact game plans as per the preparation they’ve been through.
If it’s so well known, and so obvious, then why can’t we get it right?it isnt exactly a new concept and probably not a phrase you hear Bellamy or Bennett say because its just common sense that replacement players know and understand the system they come in to. But if a player isnt good enough, he isnt good enough regardless of how well he knows the system
Its up there with "just taking it a week at a time" and "full credit to the boys" for me... both are true, but do they really need to be said ad nauseum?
Of course they can’t. Falling in a heap though is very different to not being able to compete.I think we have worked hard on getting our top 17 right, the next stage will be 18-30.
sadly no team has the cattle to account for 5-6 key players out,