Retire Packer?

PabloX

Well-known member
The Brisbane Broncos are on the verge of continuing their roster clean out by asking long-term captain Darius Boyd to retire at season's end.

The dual premiership and former Origin fullback has born the brunt of widespread criticism this season after a handful of shocking performances, including after last Friday's loss to the South Sydney Rabbitohs.


Boyd is still contracted with the Broncos for another two season on a rich $800,000 deal, however with Anthony Seibold arriving at the start of the year, the club is looking to reinvigorate its young roster.

https://www.sportingnews.com/au/amp/league/news/nrl-2019-brisbane-broncos-may-ask-daius-boyd-to-retire/1tkw6i4pxy0fz1viawjionhw19?__twitter_impression=true

Surely Boyd won't be forgoing $1.6m...

How do we do the same with Packer?
 
With the potential for him to earn somewhere in the ballpark of 1.5 Mil over the next 2 years? Good luck.
 
@matchball said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054243) said:
Packer isn't going anywhere. He is happy to play reserves for his money.
No pride. Just a bludger.

I saw ol' Greg Eastwood getting his $800k for Newtown the other day. He looked pretty happy.
 
@Masterton said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054248) said:
@matchball said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054243) said:
Packer isn't going anywhere. He is happy to play reserves for his money.
No pride. Just a bludger.

I saw ol' Greg Eastwood getting his $800k for Newtown the other day. He looked pretty happy.

His $800K ended last year, he's playing for a crate of pies and a sausage roll this year.
 
A medical retirement (ie, injury forces a retirement) I believe allows a player to be paid out without that money being included in the cap.

Isn't that how Parra got around their cap drama's via Anthony Watmough?
 
@madunit said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054251) said:
A medical retirement (ie, injury forces a retirement) I believe allows a player to be paid out without that money being included in the cap.

Isn't that how Parra got around their cap drama's via Anthony Watmough?

Would have to get signed off by the insurer though wouldn't it? And insurers don't like paying out anything in my experience.
 
@madunit said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054251) said:
A medical retirement (ie, injury forces a retirement) I believe allows a player to be paid out without that money being included in the cap.

Isn't that how Parra got around their cap drama's via Anthony Watmough?

A medical retirement would only happen if he couldn't get back on the field. There's no signs of that with Packer. Not every injury can be medically retired.
 
@avocadoontoast Insurers don't like paying out - you got that right.

But sometimes they have no option. Medical retirements have happened a few times in the past few years I believe, so that could be a workaround.
 
@bythebeardofzeus said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054234) said:
Boyd would be a shoe-in for a media job surely...


Now that’s the funniest thing I have read in a while.
 
No way Packer could be retired medically - he was injured (toe) has had an operation and I would think would be fit to play for 2020.

Matulino is another kettle of fish - knee is gone, has played most of the games in the past few years until the knee went a few months ago - he would be a chance to be medically retired.
 
I'm not saying he can be Medically retired. I merely said it was the only way I could see how you could retire a player and pay them out without the salary coming under the cap.
 
You can be assured that the Broncos will offer to "look after" Boyd if he does choose to retire.

To avoid NRL scrutiny it will be an unofficial thing, because Robbie Farah, but it will be there. Question for Darius is whether he trusts his short-term financial future to a handshake agreement.

Personally I'd take it, if he is ok to stop playing footy. Get a big old payout agreement and if the Broncos renege or it falls apart, go public with the deal and ruin the club. He would surely have them over a barrel.
 
@jirskyr said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054288) said:
You can be assured that the Broncos will offer to "look after" Boyd if he does choose to retire.

To avoid NRL scrutiny it will be an unofficial thing, because Robbie Farah, but it will be there. Question for Darius is whether he trusts his short-term financial future to a handshake agreement.

Personally I'd take it, if he is ok to stop playing footy. Get a big old payout agreement and if the Broncos renege or it falls apart, go public with the deal and ruin the club. He would surely have them over a barrel.

From what I heard it will be ESL if it happens ...it won't be a retirement as such

Broncs can thank Unca Wayne for that mess
 
If you force a player into retirement it's usually off the back of negotiating a deal. You still have to pay them, just not as much. Example. they could pay Boyd 0.7m of his 1.6m owed to retire now.

Pro for Boyd: Get 700k right now, don't have to work for 2 years to get it.
Pro for Broncos: Free up some salary cap space to pay other players more.
Con for Boyd: Miss out on 900k.
Con for Broncos: Club has to fill his spot with a 700k handicap over 2 years as that retirement deal is a part of the salary cap; getting rid of captain could cause unrest in squad.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054301) said:
@jirskyr said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054288) said:
You can be assured that the Broncos will offer to "look after" Boyd if he does choose to retire.

To avoid NRL scrutiny it will be an unofficial thing, because Robbie Farah, but it will be there. Question for Darius is whether he trusts his short-term financial future to a handshake agreement.

Personally I'd take it, if he is ok to stop playing footy. Get a big old payout agreement and if the Broncos renege or it falls apart, go public with the deal and ruin the club. He would surely have them over a barrel.

From what I heard it will be ESL if it happens ...it won't be a retirement as such

Broncs can thank Unca Wayne for that mess

The bronco's will pay him whether he plays or not, the NRL will stick their head in the sand as usual, and that will be the end of it, mean while we will be playing $337k under the cap again for a BS penalty, no cred NRL are a joke
 
i haven't watched packer in 2019 but i would think he still has a lot to offer in terms of experience and leadership, especially considering how young our pack is.
 
@Masterton said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054248) said:
@matchball said in [Retire Packer?](/post/1054243) said:
Packer isn't going anywhere. He is happy to play reserves for his money.
No pride. Just a bludger.

I saw ol' Greg Eastwood getting his $800k for Newtown the other day. He looked pretty happy.

Noticed that too.....the smile on his dial was as wide as his frame....
 
Back
Top