Shouldn't that be the other way round..
What’s better, we give Bulldogs an amount we are willing to pay so we can know how much money we have to play for the future, or let bulldogs offer probably minimum wage
What's better is we offer nothing and the Bulldogs pay as much as it costs to get him if they want him so much..if they are just offering minimum to get him ..it's not a good deal for us at all
I'm just glad Pascoe stated 2 seasons ago Wests Tigers has learnt from the mistakes of the past in relation to the salary cap and will not be paying for players to play for other teams in the future..
Bulldogs won’t willingly offer to pay half his contract, they want him as cheap as possible. It’s in the tigers hands to tell bulldogs ‘we’ll pay this much and you can pay the rest’
What if we offer more not knowing what the Dogs are prepared to pay...
When I've sold something 2nd hand you don't undersell yourself..
That’s why the first offer you bring to them is they paying a good half of the contract then you can work your way down from there
OK lets offer to pay 50 dollars..
How many bitcoin is that
Or should I now say Qoin
Now there is a thought
If we pay our players in Qoin, does that count towards the cap
Or count against the Qap?