Reynolds back to Bulldogs?

Status
Not open for further replies.
not everything on here is bogus told forum last week it was happening. Thanks to those that didnt just mock the idea as mistruth far too much of that on here sometimes
easy to be a knocker
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149512) said:
Hi guys hearing from my contact we are now paying north of 500k for Reynolds deal a bit high but he probably needs to go. It will leave us with 250k not much to buy anyone with

Sounds about right for this year, as we would already be up for $400k plus as of today based on a $750k a year contract, but would hope that the terms are at least a little more favourable for next season.
 
@dazza65 said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149484) said:
@gallagher said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149411) said:
@LeichhardtTiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149383) said:
Compare the Pair:

Josh Reynolds
GP T G FG PTs
152 44 0 5 181

or Mick Neill?
167 26 0 0 104

Both great players with big hearts.

Mick Neil was unbreakable.

He was; a skinny white redheaded gangly kid but tough as old boots

A Benedict boy. Same as Cogger.
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149512) said:
Hi guys hearing from my contact we are now paying north of 500k for Reynolds deal a bit high but he probably needs to go. It will leave us with 250k not much to buy anyone with

Sounds overs and assumes that jrey doesnt take a cut personally.

The doggies figure might be right, but I doubt we'll be paying that much.
 
@JoshColeman99 said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149523) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149522) said:
@Geo said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149517) said:
The Daily Telegraph Reporting It's Look Like Bulldogs Have Got Their Man,With Confirmation Of The Deal To Come In The Next 48 Hours.

Bwahahahahahaa...now the tele is stealing our stuff

It’s actually hilarious how many times I saw lesser journos like The Mole make articles saying we’re linked to players based off things in here ?

I reckon if everyone all started saying we’ve signed JAC we got told by sources it would be online in less than 24 hours

I am sure every "journalist" goes through all clubs forums trying to cobble together bits of speculation to sell newspapers and if they cant find info they invent it.Nearly all of them are truly beneath contempt.
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149527) said:
i think 500k is too much for a deal the 250k was laughed at apparently
think we are dudded a bit

If you’re getting your info on the $s from the bulldogs side of things ..... then ... my understanding from the people I’m hearing from is that whatever the figure that has been settled for WT to top up comes to be ..... then Reynolds will have to carry some of that weight also. That’s why Madge comment that “it’s up to Josh now to decide”.
 
Thing is wouldn’t a good half of Reynolds contract already have been paid? Let bulldogs just put a little bit towards the rest of it This year and they can take majority of it for next year.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149496) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149495) said:
@tiger_one said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149493) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149485) said:
@dazza65 said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149484) said:
@gallagher said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149411) said:
@LeichhardtTiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149383) said:
Compare the Pair:

Josh Reynolds
GP T G FG PTs
152 44 0 5 181

or Mick Neill?
167 26 0 0 104

Both great players with big hearts.

Mick Neil was unbreakable.

He was; a skinny white redheaded gangly kid but tough as old boots

I can't remember a club he didn't play for lol


Gladstone Raiders ??

yea

@tiger_one said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149493) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149485) said:
@dazza65 said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149484) said:
@gallagher said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149411) said:
@LeichhardtTiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149383) said:
Compare the Pair:

Josh Reynolds
GP T G FG PTs
152 44 0 5 181

or Mick Neill?
167 26 0 0 104

Both great players with big hearts.

Mick Neil was unbreakable.

He was; a skinny white redheaded gangly kid but tough as old boots

I can't remember a club he didn't play for lol


Gladstone Raiders ??

He wasn't good enough to get a game T_1 lol

And rangas dead set can't play

Boooooo
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149526) said:
not everything on here is bogus told forum last week it was happening. Thanks to those that didnt just mock the idea as mistruth far too much of that on here sometimes
easy to be a knocker


Good work jedi
Gold star for you
 
@JoshColeman99 said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149523) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149522) said:
@Geo said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149517) said:
The Daily Telegraph Reporting It's Look Like Bulldogs Have Got Their Man,With Confirmation Of The Deal To Come In The Next 48 Hours.

Bwahahahahahaa...now the tele is stealing our stuff

It’s actually hilarious how many times I saw lesser journos like The Mole make articles saying we’re linked to players based off things in here ?

I reckon if everyone all started saying we’ve signed JAC we got told by sources it would be online in less than 24 hours

It's been done before... Forums duping "journos"
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149526) said:
not everything on here is bogus told forum last week it was happening. Thanks to those that didnt just mock the idea as mistruth far too much of that on here sometimes
easy to be a knocker

Don’t have self pity. If your info is as solid as you say, you shouldn’t feel the need for validation.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149541) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149526) said:
not everything on here is bogus told forum last week it was happening. Thanks to those that didnt just mock the idea as mistruth far too much of that on here sometimes
easy to be a knocker

Don’t have self pity. If your info is as solid as you say, you shouldn’t feel the need for validation.

Plus with the number of people that post bogus inside info people are right to be wary until someone proves themselves.
 
unpopular decision by some on here but hearing very very strong mail we are after euan aitkin potentially a release for this year from dragons but more likely next year
 
Paying $500k of a salary for another club shows me we still struggle big time with our roster and cap management.
A shiny new gym won't fix that.
 
@gallagher said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149553) said:
Paying $500k of a salary for another club shows me we still struggle big time with our roster and cap management.
A shiny new gym won't fix that.

but but...never mind
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149544) said:
unpopular decision by some on here but hearing very very strong mail we are after euan aitkin potentially a release for this year from dragons but more likely next year

Wasn't that rumoured before June 30 last year...?
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149544) said:
unpopular decision by some on here but hearing very very strong mail we are after euan aitkin potentially a release for this year from dragons but more likely next year

I wouldn't mind him TBH. He was pretty good 2-3 years ago, he's got a bit of ability.
Not sure why we would be wanting another centre though? That part of it doesn't make sense. Would prefer Ravalawa or Tristan Sailor if we are looking at Dragons off-casts. Wingers with pace.
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Reynolds back to Bulldogs?](/post/1149526) said:
not everything on here is bogus told forum last week it was happening. Thanks to those that didnt just mock the idea as mistruth far too much of that on here sometimes
easy to be a knocker

This post isn't going to help dispel the 'Smoking Gun' speculation.

Happy to hear any info that you may have in the future though, no harm in it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top