Round 16 Discussion *SPOILERS*

@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215488) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215484) said:
@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215483) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215478) said:
Kelly is lifted off the ground and the tackle is allowed to continue so he is taken towards the sideline. Would never happen to the Rorters.

What did you make of the tackle in the disallowed try?

Technically a tackle.

Technically yes. But i find it interesting because the Kelly tackle into the sideline was technically a tackle also.
It’s like they made the call due to size of the player and difficulty in the opposition being shifted in the tackle.

Issue is he was lifted off the ground and then they tried to take him out.
 
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215492) said:
@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215488) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215484) said:
@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215483) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215478) said:
Kelly is lifted off the ground and the tackle is allowed to continue so he is taken towards the sideline. Would never happen to the Rorters.

What did you make of the tackle in the disallowed try?

Technically a tackle.

Technically yes. But i find it interesting because the Kelly tackle into the sideline was technically a tackle also.
It’s like they made the call due to size of the player and difficulty in the opposition being shifted in the tackle.

Issue is he was lifted off the ground and then they tried to take him out.

I guess he was lifted just before being taken out so the tackle momentum was continuing. Thought a lifted player was held.
If kelly resisted fighting and threw his hands in the air would of been a penalty.
 
@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215497) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215492) said:
@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215488) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215484) said:
@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215483) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215478) said:
Kelly is lifted off the ground and the tackle is allowed to continue so he is taken towards the sideline. Would never happen to the Rorters.

What did you make of the tackle in the disallowed try?

Technically a tackle.

Technically yes. But i find it interesting because the Kelly tackle into the sideline was technically a tackle also.
It’s like they made the call due to size of the player and difficulty in the opposition being shifted in the tackle.

Issue is he was lifted off the ground and then they tried to take him out.

I guess he was lifted just before being taken out so the tackle momentum was continuing. Thought a lifted player was held.
If kelly resisted fighting and threw his hands in the air would of been a penalty.


Ref should of called held when Lomax continued to take him towards the sideline and yes should then have been penalised.
 
@Cairnstigers said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215461) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215247) said:
Souths are no chance of winning the comp.

I wouldn't say that
With Mitchell out now Johnston will slot into the fullback position
He will be playing for his future at souths
It will be interesting to see how he goes
If he kills it his price goes up
If he is a dud we will sign him up
Probably already have


I’ll say it. Mark my words. They are Buckley’s of beating the top sides. And no Parra are not a top side.
 
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215505) said:
Sammy and Kelly would look good in Tigers colours

Kelly's a ball hog. Stiff's his winger several times a game.

Didn't we have a go at sammy 12 months ago?
 
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215474) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215473) said:
Ash Taylor is the most disappointing player of the last 5 years.

He's ousted Brooks for the title

Especially for the price!
 
@Spud_Murphy said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215511) said:
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215474) said:
@sheer64 said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215473) said:
Ash Taylor is the most disappointing player of the last 5 years.

He's ousted Brooks for the title

Especially for the price!

If someone offered Brooks or Taylor, you'd wack them across the head and ask what the third option is
 
@Aesopian said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215536) said:
@Geo said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215525) said:
Papali would have stopped Fogarty..

Is Fogarty's pace over-rated? or is Papalii's pace under-rated?

Got up to 34km an hour in the chase so I’d say so to the latter.
 
@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215540) said:
@Aesopian said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215536) said:
@Geo said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215525) said:
Papali would have stopped Fogarty..

Is Fogarty's pace over-rated? or is Papalii's pace under-rated?

Got up to 34km an hour in the chase so I’d say so to the latter.

I would be checking the equipment
 
@Needaname said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215540) said:
@Aesopian said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215536) said:
@Geo said in [Round 16 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1215525) said:
Papali would have stopped Fogarty..

Is Fogarty's pace over-rated? or is Papalii's pace under-rated?

Got up to 34km an hour in the chase so I’d say so to the latter.

Impressive if true. That's a lot of mass moving fast
 
Back
Top