Round 20 *Spoilers..

@ said:
Worse thing bout watching this game is that Jason Taylor and James Tedesco have helped make Roosters look unstoppable 🤮

Jason Taylor is getting moved sideways to a development position, he hasn't done squat
 
@ said:
Is Justin Hodges speaking English? He is basically incoherent, if his head busted open surely sawdust would spill out. What a vegetable. How the hell does he get a media gig let alone a spot in the commentary box?

Still easier to listen to than Blocker
 
Good to see the Dragons annual end of year crash is on track. It’s looking like a two horse race atm between the Roosters and Storm. Souths and Penrith could challenge, but the last two weeks I have questions about whether Souths peaked too early, and Penrith are far too inconsistent. Put a line through the rest.
 
@ said:
Good to see the Dragons annual end of year crash is on track. It’s looking like a two horse race atm between the Roosters and Storm. Souths and Penrith could challenge, but the last two weeks I have questions about whether Souths peaked too early, and Penrith are far too inconsistent. Put a line through the rest.

As long as the salary sombrero's of the roosters and bronco's don't win, I can cop it
 
@ said:
@ said:
Is Justin Hodges speaking English? He is basically incoherent, if his head busted open surely sawdust would spill out. What a vegetable. How the hell does he get a media gig let alone a spot in the commentary box?

Still easier to listen to than Blocker

At least Blocker is knowledgable about the intricacies of the game, Hodges is a dribbling mess. He must be mates with someone of influence at Fox surely, he is an embarrassment to RL with his dullard ramblings.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Is Justin Hodges speaking English? He is basically incoherent, if his head busted open surely sawdust would spill out. What a vegetable. How the hell does he get a media gig let alone a spot in the commentary box?

Imagine trying to conduct a HIA on him.

It would be a good laugh at the very least.
Count up to 5 and first 3 letters of the alphabet would be enough of a test to rule him out I'd reckon.
Tool on the field and an absolute cretin off of it.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Is Justin Hodges speaking English? He is basically incoherent, if his head busted open surely sawdust would spill out. What a vegetable. How the hell does he get a media gig let alone a spot in the commentary box?

Imagine trying to conduct a HIA on him.

It would be a good laugh at the very least.
Count up to 5 and first 3 letters of the alphabet would be enough of a test to rule him out I'd revvvckon.
Tool on the field and an absolute cretin off of it.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Is Justin Hodges speaking English? He is basically incoherent, if his head busted open surely sawdust would spill out. What a vegetable. How the hell does he get a media gig let alone a spot in the commentary box?

Still easier to listen to than Blocker

**At least Blocker is knowledgable about the intricacies of the game,** Hodges is a dribbling mess. He must be mates with someone of influence at Fox surely, he is an embarrassment to RL with his dullard ramblings.

Like last week in the Warriors-Storm game when the Warriors were attacking the Storms line with a minute to go to force golden point and Blocker was saying how much the Storm would be loving it. The guy is deadset clueless.
 
@ said:
@ said:
The Storm would be loving what?

The fact that the Warriors were attacking their line. As I said, clueless.

Loving testing their abilities in goalline defence, loving that the Warriors weren't throwing much at them in attack….could've meant a few things TBH. When he speaks on panel shows about the nuts and bolts of RL he is very concise IMO. Was very skillful as a player for a big unit, I'd guess he'd know what he is talking about when it comes to playing the game.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
The Storm would be loving what?

The fact that the Warriors were attacking their line. As I said, clueless.

Loving testing their abilities in goalline defence, loving that the Warriors weren't throwing much at them in attack….could've meant a few things TBH. When he speaks on panel shows about the nuts and bolts of RL he is very concise IMO. Was very skillful as a player for a big unit, I'd guess he'd know what he is talking about when it comes to playing the game.

He was talking up the Storms defence, saying how they would have been loving it. I don’t think that would that would have been the case.
 
@ said:
Roosters vs Storm GF

Looks logical at the moment.
But early days.
It was only few weeks back that everyone was saying that the Dragons and the Bunnies were unbeatable.
Storm definitely looks the most stable and experienced to go back to back.
But lot can change by GF day in mid-September.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
The Storm would be loving what?

The fact that the Warriors were attacking their line. As I said, clueless.

Loving testing their abilities in goalline defence, loving that the Warriors weren't throwing much at them in attack….could've meant a few things TBH. When he speaks on panel shows about the nuts and bolts of RL he is very concise IMO. Was very skillful as a player for a big unit, I'd guess he'd know what he is talking about when it comes to playing the game.

He was talking up the Storms defence, saying how they would have been loving it. I don’t think that would that would have been the case.

Maybe you could leave your obvious dislike of some people out of your comments.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top