TieDye
Well-known member
IT’S A RORT. Sorry capsTwo weeks in a row tries taken off us when scores were level. We shoot ourselves enough, don't need the refs to as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IT’S A RORT. Sorry capsTwo weeks in a row tries taken off us when scores were level. We shoot ourselves enough, don't need the refs to as well.
Simple if its a 50/50 bunker judgement call .Its a knock back if its one of the top teams and a knock forward if its one of the bottom teams .Graham Annesley saying our first try which was overturned by the bunker was 'subjective' view of the bunker 50/50, camera angles.... in his view it was a knock back but his view doesnt matter it was the bunker.... makes me sick. What about the qn of was their sufficient evidence to overturn the ruling if it was a 50/50 call.... does my head in
Annesley said it was the opinion of the bunkers view that the ball went forward, and their opinion is what ultimately matters.Graham Annesley saying our first try which was overturned by the bunker was 'subjective' view of the bunker 50/50, camera angles.... in his view it was a knock back but his view doesnt matter it was the bunker.... makes me sick. What about the qn of was their sufficient evidence to overturn the ruling if it was a 50/50 call.... does my head in
You’re singing to the deaf, NRL knows and does nothingAnnesley said it was the opinion of the bunkers view that the ball went forward, and their opinion is what ultimately matters.
The bunker is not to make rulings on opinions! They have to have clear & conclusive evidence on a decision to overturn it or they have to go with the onfield decision of the referee.
Graham Annesley saying our first try which was overturned by the bunker was 'subjective' view of the bunker 50/50, camera angles.... in his view it was a knock back but his view doesnt matter it was the bunker.... makes me sick. What about the qn of was their sufficient evidence to overturn the ruling if it was a 50/50 call.... does my head in