SACK TAYLOR NOW......

@Russell said:
@Tiger In The Gong said:
Surely the club wouldnt have signed a young coach on a 3 year contract without a couple of get out clauses.

Surely not after the Sheens fiasco.

Some of you guys just refuse to admit the coach is struggling.

He's not struggling - the players are struggling.

Like i said some of you guys just refuse to admit what is blatantly obvious.
 
We scored enough points last night to win the game. Should also have been credited with the non obstruction try as well imo.
Did they score those tries with an attacking plan?, play what was in front of them? or was it a mirage?

We lost the game!

Now that must mean our defense let us down ( Taylor is not out there tackling for them), that either means they are not good enough (incapable), or they are not putting the defense structure that Taylor is teaching them into practice. Seizer walked through the gap between Woods and Sue, the gaps out wide - partly caused by Brooks going for decoys and Richards trying to cover for Hoeter's bad reads, positional play and inability at the moment to tackle let in a few more tries.

TT you have made the suggestion on here a few times - "let them play what is in front of them - even for a half a game." You and others should see from last night, that will not work. we end up getting into the roundabout again of " bugger the defense - we'll score more tries than you." We are trying to get away from this; IT WILL NOT WORK!

So it's back to working on defense - which is what JT is doing.

Give him a go for Gods sake. Half an off season, 13 games, no money to buy people and the necessity to let people go too early because of cash.

He is left with the youngest and most inexperienced team in the NRL ( probably ever).
 
I think a really simple way to alleviate a lot of the problems that we face as a team defence wise, is to get the kicking game and chase right. Both of which have never been so bad as far as I can remember. Forget the bombs unless they're prepared to chase well, hit the grass, the in goal and corners and you're halfway there. But our chase needs to at least exist. Can't these clowns see that it's better to defend near the opponents line rather than have them starting their set at their 30 or 40 meter line?
 
Ok let's sack him now yeah he is a dud coach no game plan blah blah blah, so where do we get our next coach from or better still where do we get the Money to not only pay out Taylor but to pay the new Coach also, fair dinkum imo Taylor is struggling no doubt about it the youngest side in tigers history a salary cap that got blown out by PREVIOUS Administrations letting go of players who were taking up space in the cap re Blair, Austin and others. If you look at where the kids come from U20 it's no wonder they can't bloody tackle that comp is a touch football comp, Taylor is doing ok atm do I hate losing yes but I will give him till October next year before I call for his sacking
\
\
Mafia

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
@MAFIA said:
Ok let's sack him now yeah he is a dud coach no game plan blah blah blah, so where do we get our next coach from or better still where do we get the Money to not only pay out Taylor but to pay the new Coach also, fair dinkum imo Taylor is struggling no doubt about it the youngest side in tigers history a salary cap that got blown out by PREVIOUS Administrations letting go of players who were taking up space in the cap re Blair, Austin and others. If you look at where the kids come from U20 it's no wonder they can't bloody tackle that comp is a touch football comp, Taylor is doing ok atm do I hate losing yes but I will give him till October next year before I call for his sacking
\
\
Mafia

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_

Your best post ever. :sign:
 
imo that would have to be worst team we have ever fielded since inception

Luckily for me I got off the ride last week and watched the game in fast forward later in the night so i only wasted 20 mins.

Taylor has made his main KPI defence. He will have to answer for that soon because the defence is abysmal.
\
\
:deadhorse:
 
@Russell said:
@TrueTiger said:
I have said before and I will say it again,even though some on this forum will shoot me down again….I will not buy into this so called defensive structure that must be strictly adhered to because that's what Taylor is building this teams strength on...it's a road of the teams demise if it continues the way it is going..for example the game tonight the WTs let in 3 soft trys the defense was pitiful,the left edge was pitiful,and don't say it was all Pattycakes fault because on a couple of occasions he had three opposition players to mark while Brooks and co were huddled and left a gap..where was the defensive structure then...I will tell you..theses young players are getting bored quicker than us the supporters and are probably sick of the same gameplan week after week...so what's my answer...here it is...when the young players played what was infront of them,we attacked and came up with points and a couple of disallowed trys,the effort was there for all to see....this is their game,as for defence you learn how to tackle and mark your man from an early age,if these guys don't know that by now,then Im afraid there is no hope for them at all...

Some on here will say that I have been negative toward Taylor's coaching,I don't care about his coaching CV,he is here for the duration because we can't afford anyone else or to pay him out..we are stuck with him and that's about that...he may surprise me with some different tactics and if he does good for him...I can see the team keep going backwards if Taylor keeps this crap up....when you have commentators such as Joey Johns saying "the young ones need to play what's infront of them" and our coach restricts them,then no wonder Johns is in the hall of fame and JT won't get to within a bulls roar of the hall of fame,then questions really have to be asked...Yes Iam disappointed with tonight's game and the result,however,I realise Simona and Noofa will inject some class and speed back in the team and Lawrence can stay in the backrow,he did extremely well tonight...

Just for the forumers who can't wait to tear into me I will say it again,this defensive structure is hurting the attacking potential of this team,I dare say if JT doesn't let them play to their game and that is what's infront of them,we may even lose the young guys to other clubs...Taylor must formulate a game plan other than what we have witnessed for weeks,for the good of the team and the good of the club that Iam very passionate about...

Ok TT I'll bite.

We scored enough points last night to win the game. Should also have been credited with the non obstruction try as well imo.
Did they score those tries with an attacking plan?, play what was in front of them? or was it a mirage?

We lost the game!

Now that must mean our defense let us down ( Taylor is not out there tackling for them), that either means they are not good enough (incapable), or they are not putting the defense structure that Taylor is teaching them into practice. Seizer walked through the gap between Woods and Sue, the gaps out wide - partly caused by Brooks going for decoys and Richards trying to cover for Hoeter's bad reads, positional play and inability at the moment to tackle let in a few more tries.

TT you have made the suggestion on here a few times - "let them play what is in front of them - even for a half a game." You and others should see from last night, that will not work. we end up getting into the roundabout again of " bugger the defense - we'll score more tries than you." We are trying to get away from this; IT WILL NOT WORK!

So it's back to working on defense - which is what JT is doing.

Give him a go for Gods sake. Half an off season, 13 games, no money to buy people and the necessity to let people go too early because of cash.

He is left with the youngest and most inexperienced team in the NRL ( probably ever).

You guys are the hardest markers in the world.

Yes Russell I probably am hard at the moment because the start of the game is where we lost last night …they let in three soft trys and this team isnt capable of overcoming a start like that and winning the game....more proof last night...As you say it probably is the cattle we have that cannot commit to the defensive structure Taylor has in place,once again we have no depth and recruitment of class FGers is a long way off...so yes I will have to let JT keep on bashing his head against the wall until the team he has gets it right....but I dont have to like it or agree with it...it was fantastic to watch the young blokes create opportunities and mount a come back all be it for 15...20 mins...
their forte is attack and that was on display last night,just hope this defensive structure sinks in before we are all SUNK......
 
In all this melodrama…I have not seen I post offering a viable alternative who we could afford whilst paying out another Coach...

I Know sometimes reality sucks...
 
@Geo. said:
In all this melodrama…I have not seen I post offering a viable alternative who we could afford whilst paying out another Coach...

I Know sometimes reality sucks...

If it gets to the stage where they have to sack him it will be a matter of damned if you do damned if you dont, the poor form is already costing us money and putting additional things like sponsorship at risk.

Money wont be the be all and end all.

The cheap way out is to promote Kidwell.

Its not that hard, reality pfttt very subjective around here.
 
And all you experts on our our accounts, well not one of you know or care to mention if the club might have performance clauses in Taylors contract.

After the Sheens saga only a fool would sign someone for 3 years without them.
 
@Tiger In The Gong said:
And all you experts on our our accounts, well not one of you know or care to mention if the club might have performance clauses in Taylors contract.

After the Sheens saga only a fool would sign someone for 3 years without them.

Does he have clauses…?
 
@Geo. said:
@Tiger In The Gong said:
And all you experts on our our accounts, well not one of you know or care to mention if the club might have performance clauses in Taylors contract.

After the Sheens saga only a fool would sign someone for 3 years without them.

Does he have clauses…?

Exactly Geo, no one knows the contract situation.

Fail to see how anyone can be adamant he wont be sacked because of money.
 
@Tiger In The Gong said:
@Geo. said:
In all this melodrama…I have not seen I post offering a viable alternative who we could afford whilst paying out another Coach...

I Know sometimes reality sucks...

If it gets to the stage where they have to sack him it will be a matter of damned if you do damned if you dont, the poor form is already costing us money and putting additional things like sponsorship at risk.

Money wont be the be all and end all.

The cheap way out is to promote Kidwell.

Its not that hard, reality pfttt very subjective around here.

So your saying that we should put a rookie coach over JT into the prime role to mentor the rookies, the same coach who has been in charge of our defence over the last few years and well we have seen how amazingly great that has been.

Seriously that will do me amazing recommendation….....

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
@Tiger In The Gong said:
@Geo. said:
In all this melodrama…I have not seen I post offering a viable alternative who we could afford whilst paying out another Coach...

I Know sometimes reality sucks...

If it gets to the stage where they have to sack him it will be a matter of damned if you do damned if you dont, the poor form is already costing us money and putting things like sponsorship at risk.

Money wont be the be all and end all.

The cheap way out is to promote Kidwell.

Its not that hard, reality pfttt very subjective around here.

So you would promote our defence coach after the showings of this season?

If it was crap tactics but we had solid defence I could understand… but we can be porous in D more often than we are solid, the same as when went competently adhere to Taylors structures we go ok though more often than not make a dogs breakfast of it.

The real issue is why is our form is so inconsistent. The only consistency we have is that we will be inexplicably inconsistent. That is the root of our problems.
 
@Geo. said:
In all this melodrama…I have not seen I post offering a viable alternative who we could afford whilst paying out another Coach...

I Know sometimes reality sucks...

Absolute genius

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
I forgot you really have to dumb things down on here sometimes.

No i wouldnt promote Kidwell, i was saying he is the cheap option if the club is forced into sacking Taylor.

And no I wouldnt sack Taylor, not yet at least…..
 
@Jerry Seinfeld said:
@MAFIA said:
Ok let's sack him now yeah he is a dud coach no game plan blah blah blah, so where do we get our next coach from or better still where do we get the Money to not only pay out Taylor but to pay the new Coach also, fair dinkum imo Taylor is struggling no doubt about it the youngest side in tigers history a salary cap that got blown out by PREVIOUS Administrations letting go of players who were taking up space in the cap re Blair, Austin and others. If you look at where the kids come from U20 it's no wonder they can't bloody tackle that comp is a touch football comp, Taylor is doing ok atm do I hate losing yes but I will give him till October next year before I call for his sacking
\
\
Mafia

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_

I thought so to jerry
\
\
Your best post ever. :sign:

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
Won't matter who the coach is, the team is made up of wanna be's, gunna be's never been and a sprinkling of has beens.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
@Geo. said:
In all this melodrama…I have not seen I post offering a viable alternative who we could afford whilst paying out another Coach...

I Know sometimes reality sucks...

Cmon Geo we identify the problems, we cant also be held accountable for fixing them!
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top