happy_tiger
Well-known member
My idea is to stop teams even thinking about reoffending in the future .
CB do you think what has happened to the Storm has done that
Hell No
All I want to see is set rules in place so teams know exactly what will happen if it occurs again and my point if we make them extreme enough no one will even think about it
Why would making all contracts null and void be unfair making them start from scratch so we know they are definitely under the cap With what occurred how did we know for real the storm weren't still over the cap
Oh I see it is Melbourne so they are different because they are in a difficult market Maybe the Storm did this knowing that would be the NRL reaction
If it was the Broncos it would be different with your analogy CB
The cap violations that some others are talking about are level 2 breaches with can be linked to injuries etc having to bring more players through that weren't part of your initial list These breaches are quite common and completely different than what both Melbourne and Canterbury did
CB do you think what has happened to the Storm has done that
Hell No
All I want to see is set rules in place so teams know exactly what will happen if it occurs again and my point if we make them extreme enough no one will even think about it
Why would making all contracts null and void be unfair making them start from scratch so we know they are definitely under the cap With what occurred how did we know for real the storm weren't still over the cap
Oh I see it is Melbourne so they are different because they are in a difficult market Maybe the Storm did this knowing that would be the NRL reaction
If it was the Broncos it would be different with your analogy CB
The cap violations that some others are talking about are level 2 breaches with can be linked to injuries etc having to bring more players through that weren't part of your initial list These breaches are quite common and completely different than what both Melbourne and Canterbury did