Sheens & Blair

@cqtiger said:
@MacDougall said:
They offered him another role and he turned it down. There's probably grounds to suggest that they met their end of the employment arrangement by offering him another role. When he turned it down he effectively quit.

Unfortunately, Sheens is in a position of strength here. We've all been told that Sheens did not have KPI's to meet so effectively he can't be dismissed for doing his job poorly evidence-wise.
In industry if you are asked to take a lesser role in a company then obviously they are looking to get rid of you because you failed to meet your KPI's. Most people would refuse this option because of less pay offered and would probably accept a "redundancy". In Sheens case, there's no way of proving a redundancy as we need a football coach.
Either way, he wins. Pay out the full amount or accept that he has a strong case of unfair dismissal and pay further penalties.

Don't forget, it's not his fault that they offered him another long term contract. Which he duly signed.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

Well said that man.

We should've said that season 2013 would be Tim Sheens last at the club and conducted a proper search and transition with a new coach. Like Souths did with Johnny Lang. The way it went down was too acrimonious for a coach that won us our first comp. As always with wests tigers there must be blood when we don't like something.

Not perfect but better than the situation we are finding ourselves in now.
 
Im sorry but did everyones IQ drop 50 points? :crazy

In what world is Blair's form acceptable or first grade standard? and this has NOTHING to do with the salary he is on. In 13 matches he has cracked the 100m mark once and he is averaging over 60 minutes a match. Last week in a dominated pack a what 7 game? rookie in sue made 90m..where was blair? against souths he had 1 hit up in the first half, has had millions of missed tackles all season. His form is not acceptable by his standards nor first grade. He has been consistently out performed by NSW Cup players and NYC players - wake up. And think about this if he only costs us 100 grand a season that is an absolute bargain - thats 400 grand free, that price would probably cover martin taupau along AND another quality forward… since moving to prop he has been a 3-4/10 as opposed to a 1-2/10 kick him for god's sake :deadhorse:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top