@tony-soprano said in [Sheens](/post/1505192) said:
@selena said in [Sheens](/post/1505188) said:
@lankanflyer10-98 said in [Sheens](/post/1505179) said:
I think I might be the only Pascoe supporter on the planet, But as the CEO to get over 20,000 members at arguably the most unsuccessful club(decade no finals) in the NRL, and to be 1 of only 4 clubs to consistently make a profit at the end of each financial year from their own revenue. Salary cap management is poor but also different and is influenced by more departments at the club eg recruitment. Every year we have exceedingly strong sponsors, some clubs start the year without a primary sponsor. But to get a 70 million dollar center of excellence at the complete expense of state and local government, is some serious political lobbying, Lee H would also been on that one. How do we get all of those free to air games, other than Brisbane on Fridays, I think we get line share of what successful teams get on 9/gem.
This is a very good point.
From a CEO perspective he has done his job, however one aspect of his governance has let him down … the NRL football department has consistently failed.
A move has been made to course correct, bringing in experts and past successful resources in off field capacities. On field resources remain a problem but hopefully these new off field guys will solve this. Should this work, he deserves to be celebrated.
Pascoe was the one who wanted to play football guru, know your limits.
That's five years down the drain which is negligence.
I'm not going to try and sway any Pascoe negators...
They've well made up their minds - Based on what, They couldn't tell you... But here it is as I see it.
The CEO of the club is much of a mouth piece for the Board - A board full of Old Magpies, That hired an old Magpie (With limited Head Coaching credentials)
to coach the team... Where is where most of the hassles laid at Pascoes' feet began - Robbie Gate, The Big 4 etc. etc.
To turn a profit of any number in a game where clubs don't turn profit with the organisation as it stood when he took the job until now is a feet on its own. He handled the Taylor situation, and Hired one of the only coaches to win the comp in the last 5 years... Then handled the exit of a pot load of our best players - Could he have kept them, Well - Never say never - But all those players had contracts in front of them for a very long time and were holding the club to ransom (Holding out for something better) THEY HAD ALL WORKED EXIT STRATEGYS
As I also see it, His biggest mistake was giving said coach full autonomy over his Roster - Or was it a mistake? How many coaches take on a job where they don't get to pick the players... NONE!! (Again - Said coach is 1/3 to win a comp in the last 5 years)
So we got lumbered with another 4 years of problems, The Players Cleary bought "Clearys' Players" take us to the 8 and Pascoe is a genius, They don't and he's incompetent. I don't get it, they're the same players, And the club (Not just the CEO) hired a competent coach to choose them...
I don't even Blame the coach for the Player Performance this year, Let alone the CEO - Ridiculous.
There is 3-4 Games we could have easily won this year, That puts us in the 8 and ends these types of conversations....
Wingers letting in 3-4 Tries in the first 20 or so minutes of a game against a team that had barely scored a try all year are situations where our performances is lacking.
Pascoe may not ever be the worlds best CEO, But he's the CEO of arguably the Games worst run club...
He's done nothing but handle catastrophe after catastrophe
All in all, He's actually going OK.