While I agree that there are better players out there that we should be looking at he is what we have. The problem is that Galvin isn't using him right. If Seyfarth can't make holes you have to put him in them and that my friend is the responsibility of the playmaker.
Galvin is not an edge, but when he swings around off Luai, Luia straightens the play to engage the inside shoulder of a defender and then the pass is held up long enough for Galvin to hit the gap to try an enable a break/half break or offload. If you look at the first try agaisnt Cronulla last week it was done perfectly - the defender turns in as he straightens, Galvin gets hit as he hits the line and the ball is passed to Sam F in the clear. This doesn't happen on the other edge.
So what should be happening, to support Seyfarth to support him, is either:
- Galvin straightens/right foot step to engage the inside shoulder of the defender and dig into the line delivering the ball flat, at the ad line; or
- Seyfarth is deeper and given a target to run at (eg opposition 5/8) and Galvin shifts the player left; or right by fading/step and delivers an off the hip pop to put him into the gap; or
- uses Seyfarth as decoy and fires a face ball or double pump to give Toa more time; or
- at worst case, if there are no options, he delivers the ball early so Seyfarth can be monstered by his larger opposition (ie do what he is doing now).
This is a shared problem on that edge. Seyfarth may not be running the best lines, or have his timing quite right, but at the same time Galvin isn't doing his job of creating options for him. If Galvin wants the big $ for being a playmaker he needs to be doing the basics of his role for his edge.
I'll give him credit; he is giving his outside backs good ball but they are making the most of it mainly through their strength and skill not though Galvin's cunning. He is also all over the park - but I would prefer more quality from him than quantity. He still has a lot to learn before he is worth anywhere near $1M a season. He will only get the money based on potential - not output.