Tom Shines
Well-known member
Oh yeah...Buds is overs even now. I agree with that. Probably overs by 200k when we signed him and only by about 100k or so now, but still overs. We need to get out of that contract.
Heath Mason might make Bud expendable …. They still need another half though I think ….so they need to replace Bud and pay incentive money to another club for him that totals around the same money they are paying Bud now .,
Don't use Zero Tackle. They're most definitely worse than simply canvassing the major outlets. Half the time they don't even list the squad members correctly.
It truly baffles me that anybody uses them as a source for anything.
Can you link me to where anyone has mentioned $550k? I'd be interested to see how they've worded their article.
Also, that's fine for your point to stand, I'm not directly refuting that, it has some validity and I understand that perspective.
Your original comment was more a reminder of something I'd wanted to mention in general discussion on here for quite some time, which is in regards to the parroting of numbers that aren't based in reality or on anything concrete.
It is hard to use specific numbers when it comes to discussion of players' value, primarily because we don't actually know accurately what they are.
For example, some people may bring up Seyfarth as an example of good value, then quote a contract of ~350k-odd, yet, someone else will argue he's a waste of money at ~550k.
Point is, the reliance on figures as part of any discussion or point is shaky in our sport, unless there is the rare occurrence of some legitimate knowledge of a player's contract value.
Even small differences of 50/100k can swing the discussion one way or another and as fans, we have no idea whether what we're spouting is correct or not.
This is why I tried to fob you off initially …my experience generally is that people ask for references and then dismiss it when you give them one …
Have you provided any sources yourself as yet to support your argument of lesser amounts ?
To be fair …because there is no transparency with player salaries , none of us know for sure and each side can produce figures that support their side given the sheer amount of media content … the only alternative is for everyone to not discuss the issue to begin with…but because of the importance of the salary cap, thats probably not happening