two hookers are not a problem if one has utility value. its too big a reshuffle if you lose one of the backs mid game and you dont have a mobile player on the bench.
Im sure i have seen both MM and Liddle on the park at the same time in games this year.
if you have a pack that can hold its own, then a small guy coming off the bench can create havoc which liddle is capable of doing with his pace and support play.
I'm happy with the two. If mm was asking for more money or was signed else where i would agree to going after peats and if we did sign a 3rd hooker i think it would disrupt and impact liddle's development.
Im sure i have seen both MM and Liddle on the park at the same time in games this year.
if you have a pack that can hold its own, then a small guy coming off the bench can create havoc which liddle is capable of doing with his pace and support play.
I'm happy with the two. If mm was asking for more money or was signed else where i would agree to going after peats and if we did sign a 3rd hooker i think it would disrupt and impact liddle's development.