@Needaname said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1189978) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1189975) said:@Needaname said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1189972) said:@PabloX said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1188732) said:@Moh said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1188730) said:@PabloX said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1188720) said:Blore Garner
Different players tbh, room for both.
Sorry, it was in response to the team line up. I'd prefer starting with Blore than Garner. Definitely room for both, but Garner would be coming off the bench in my opinion.
If garner fixes up his front on defence he’ll be value.
As like all of us, we prefer Garner on the left anyway.
Could Lucy be our long term 13?
His currently punching out 80 mins in the back row and decent numbers but his being used a lot more as a battering ram than as ball playing forward utilising his silky short passing game that he was known for.
Thoughts?
You take away lucianos best asset playing him at lock, running lines and scoring close to the line. Rather Twal or Eiso at lock and let Luciano use his X factor out wide
Yeah I know, but you can’t say we are playing him into holes at the moment. Locks find plenty of space in the line don’t worry about that as I said my main issue with him playing off the halves wide is he doesn’t get to play short balls into the forwards.
When brooks has been half he didn’t get many short balls. Walters, Benji and grant have all given him good ball and he always makes impact or scores. Hes our most dangerous second rower and we’ve got some good locks at the club, no reason to move him over