Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372859) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

Because there was a rumour on SEN that Brooks is off to Canberra and at the same time Flanagan Snr and Jnr were coming to aWests Tigers

I see, big moves happening at camp concord.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372862) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.


My whole point is the screaming to get rid of him, without knowing his replacement is ridiculous. It could very easily be worse, take your example for one (IMO).

You’re more than entitled to your opinion, as am I, but Brooks biggest problem is he has no killer instinct. He’s fast and he’s skilful but he’s not a winner. There’s 8 years of evidence for that.
 
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372866) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372862) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.


My whole point is the screaming to get rid of him, without knowing his replacement is ridiculous. It could very easily be worse, take your example for one (IMO).

You’re more than entitled to your opinion, as am I, but Brooks biggest problem is he has no killer instinct. He’s fast and he’s skilful but he’s not a winner. There’s 8 years of evidence for that.


I dont have much problem with that summary.....again....depends on who you replace him with.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372868) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.

They are working better than when AD was playing 5/8th.
 
@mighty_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372878) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372868) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.

They are working better than when AD was playing 5/8th.

I disagree, it’s just that AD had to do it all because Brooks couldn’t step up. He has to with Mbye because Mbye is even less commanding than Brooks.

If AD is 6 last week we probably win. He’s the guy that needed the ball in his hand in the closing stages and never got it.
 
@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372879) said:
@geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372872) said:
Blake Green just retired.. we should entice him

4 years player option?

No I don't think he's ever been in the plodder class doesn't tick all the boxes ???
 
For all the whinging about our poor defence there is no better half in the competition than Brooks. I reckon he saves at least two tries a game. I swear to god I'm sure some don't watch other teams and just want to throw money at any name that is spewed up.
 
@telltails said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372891) said:
For all the whinging about our poor defence there is no better half in the competition than Brooks. I reckon he saves at least two tries a game. I swear to god I'm sure some don't watch other teams and just want to throw money at any name that is spewed up.

100%. If AD could defend half as good alot less points would’ve been leaked during the season.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372882) said:
@mighty_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372878) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372868) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.

They are working better than when AD was playing 5/8th.

I disagree, it’s just that AD had to do it all because Brooks couldn’t step up. He has to with Mbye because Mbye is even less commanding than Brooks.

If AD is 6 last week we probably win. He’s the guy that needed the ball in his hand in the closing stages and never got it.

The irony of this is because of his ball hog nature, he cost us a chance of the game at the end.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372868) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.

Yeah, that is why I probably wouldn't like to lock that new combo in.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372882) said:
@mighty_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372878) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372868) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.

They are working better than when AD was playing 5/8th.

I disagree, it’s just that AD had to do it all because Brooks couldn’t step up. He has to with Mbye because Mbye is even less commanding than Brooks.

If AD is 6 last week we probably win. He’s the guy that needed the ball in his hand in the closing stages and never got it.

Agreed, but he has a lot to work on still as a 5/8th. In saying that I would have picked him there this week.
 
@mighty_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372895) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372882) said:
@mighty_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372878) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372868) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.

They are working better than when AD was playing 5/8th.

I disagree, it’s just that AD had to do it all because Brooks couldn’t step up. He has to with Mbye because Mbye is even less commanding than Brooks.

If AD is 6 last week we probably win. He’s the guy that needed the ball in his hand in the closing stages and never got it.

The irony of this is because of his ball hog nature, he cost us a chance of the game at the end.

The pass should of went to him in the first place the wing man was covered.
 
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372898) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372882) said:
@mighty_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372878) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372868) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.

They are working better than when AD was playing 5/8th.

I disagree, it’s just that AD had to do it all because Brooks couldn’t step up. He has to with Mbye because Mbye is even less commanding than Brooks.

If AD is 6 last week we probably win. He’s the guy that needed the ball in his hand in the closing stages and never got it.

Agreed, but he has a lot to work on still as a 5/8th. In saying that I would have picked him there this week.

Hastings will be 6
 
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.


literally laughed out loud
 
@tony-soprano said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372904) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372898) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372882) said:
@mighty_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372878) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372868) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372864) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372861) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372854) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372851) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372849) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372839) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372836) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372791) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1372783) said:
Careful what you wish for Brooks haters.....

I’m not a Brooks hater and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend. But he’s not the guy you’d want with the ball if the games on the line. He disappears in big moments IMO.

I also think it would be probably best for him and the club if he went elsewhere. Just my opinion.


To be replaced with.........? Flanagan?

No thank you.


Then it might ***not*** be best for him ***and*** the club if he went elsewhere?

Why are we after Flanagan? I’d rather give AD and Hastings a run as our halves.

That halves pairing couldn't run out of sight on a dark night.

Well at the moment we have a 6 who is hopeless and a 7 that disappears whenever pressure is applied. I’d much rather halves who have a bit of killer instinct.

I don't think Hastings and AD would work as a pairing.

And you may well be right, but our halves at the moment aren’t working either.

They are working better than when AD was playing 5/8th.

I disagree, it’s just that AD had to do it all because Brooks couldn’t step up. He has to with Mbye because Mbye is even less commanding than Brooks.

If AD is 6 last week we probably win. He’s the guy that needed the ball in his hand in the closing stages and never got it.

Agreed, but he has a lot to work on still as a 5/8th. In saying that I would have picked him there this week.

Hastings will be 6

Not this weekend
 

Staff online

Back
Top