@weststigerman said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1382580) said:
Happy with Joffa and Seyfarth the last few weeks, but still think if we got Finucane he would help teach the squad how to compete every set in defence. Absolute maniac.
Not a podcast, but listen to what Bellamy says about him in the in the post game press conference after the Titans game.
Seyfarth appears to be our next lock. We don't need Finucane and from what we know about Seyfarth, he sets very high standards for his own training which I'm sure other players will note. In amongst the disaster yesterday that was our NSW Cup team, young Daniel Sykes came on and started to hit very hard in defence. You could see he has the drive and competitive spirit Gould often refers to in commentary. Why block our good young players with senior players at the backend of their careers?
Did Roosters need Cronk at the back end of his career when they had Pearce?
Ask the Roosters. We don't need Finucane. Let him get his retirement payday elsewhere. Those days should be over at WTs.
I don’t think you have anything to worry about. His valued at the Storm and his potential replacement in the cheese is looking to move on. So I’d say his a lock to resign for a couple of years with the Storm on about 500k a season.
So he’s good enough for Bellamy but not for us ?
No I’m not saying that. And I’m not disagreeing with you in signing him, just your price point.
My thoughts are though, is he an 80min player?
Is he suited to lock in the new game?
Is he more suited to prop?
Is he robust enough to play prop for us?
Now in answering consider that we don’t have a Jessy Bromwich, Welsh or Asofa Solomona taking the majority of the big prop work for us.
We’d probably be looking at a starting middle 3 of Twal, Joffa and Finucane next year if we were to manage to sign him.