@clontarfkid said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491166) said:
Can only think that Liddle has finally got the offer from the Dogs/eels that he always wanted!
Truth is,after considerable investment by WTs and even more patience,hes barely an NRL standard 9 as it is...and if so,for only 60 mins...and unfortunately Simpkin isnt there yet
Hogson was the one of the best 9s in the comp a year or two agobut ,isnt anything like the same player in 2021 and Ricky rightly started Starling most of the year
Not sure how much of his recent form is Ricky burnout vs body burnout
Who wld wanna be an NRL coach...!
What a ridiculous post. He’s been injured half the time he’s been here. And it’s been a lot longer than a year since Hodgson was one of the best 9’s in the comp. At 32, don’t expect him to recapture that form either.
Absolutely correct!!
Liddle is as brittle as a matchstick.Every time he gets folded you just hold yr breath that theres not yet another season ending injury..like the last time..and the time before that..and..
And when he actually does make it onto the field..and actually stay there,like he has for most of 2021,he looks pretty average tbh...nothing special... before burning out after 60 mins and needing a replacement .Not sure I want a 9 on the bench.
And btw,Im no fan of a 32 yo hooker who hasnt shown form for some while..regardless of his "leadership skills",Hodgson is the same as a Tamou or any other ...past their best-by date..and by some margin.
We need to persevere with Liddle and Simpkin for another season and see exactly what weve got,and then make an informed decision..which is unusual on this forum!
So the answer to a player whose as brittle as a matchstick is replace him with a 32 year who has had 2 knee recos in the 3 years. Very Wests Tigers. Matt Ballin 2.0
Yet agian you seem incapable of actually ..um ..reading!!It aint that hard
Think I clearly stated what I wld propose re retaining both Liddle and Simpkin for another year,with Hogson having no attraction...
Is there any other way I cld state this more clearly?
Yet again? Be nice mate.