@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505776) said:
@strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505768) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505760) said:
@upthetigers said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505719) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505714) said:
@upthetigers said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505707) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505689) said:
@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505685) said:
Rather than trying to assign points to players I think it would be pretty easy to fix the cap:
all contracts public
hard cap on TPAs (eg $2m)
better system of cap relief for juniors/veterans
With regards to the above suggestions. I massively agree with better system of rewarding clubs for developing and retaining players. However, whilst I agree about making contracts public like the US sports the Players Association have said publicly that they'll never allow it as they will claim it breaches privacy, just like capping TPD's will be disputed as restriction of trade
I don't believe in restricting TPAs
Why? The salary cap wouldn't mean a thing if you didn't restrict TPAs.
Because I don't believe in limiting what players can earn away from the game.
So you want it to be like the EPL where the richest clubs will always dominate the competition? I believe in an even playing field.
You realise that genuine TPA's are unrestricted now dont you?
I believe in a free society where authority doesnt own you like chattel slaves.
In society . Of course! Who doesn’t agree with that? But you’re talking about a form of entertainment and business where the whole thing is predicated on a belief system that 2 sides enter into a competition where as , at the very least , both have an equal chance of winning that competition. It’s literally the reason the business makes any money to begin with. And unlike , say the premier league/ English football,there is only 1 competition . There’s not the 3 cups plus 2 European completions as well .
Otherwise what are we doing ? We might as well watch WWE, if we want fixed outcomes !
But we don’t want fixed outcomes .
If the roosters/storm ,truely are that much better than the rest of the league, then fixed monetary outcomes like hard caps , luxury taxes , transparency in salaries , shouldn’t be an issue . The Patriots have dominated the NFL for a long time . And good teams like the packers , Steelers , ravens are always there or there abouts.
This is the same in the NBA with teams like The Spurs and heat etc. they’re always near the top of the league . (Spurs for the first time since 99 have a team that can’t make the finals) .
The cream will always rise to the top .
But the nrl has no parity what do ever . And the salary cap and it’s illusion that it provides that is a joke .
If the EPL is the goal , then scrap the cap. My interest will definitely fall off a cliff . Or at least it will force clubs like ours to understand our true operating budget pales in comparison .
MLB is fine with “moneyball” and this disparity.
If the NRL continues this way then they will lose the public, as we don’t have the same fan culture that the English do .
So your fix is to prevent players earning extra income?
No not at all . I’m saying their salaries should be transparent . Endorsements / sponsorships etc is 100% their prerogative. They should own thier image rights and be able to capitalise on that .
Stop calling it TPAs and let the market place dictate their income . But if any team is caught arranging TPAs or anything like that the fines should be severe / competition points .
If you go to the roosters , and uncle nick introduces you to the chick who runs boost juice , and she wants to give you 250k to do a few ads , well whatever . You can’t stop people talking .
But if for example Brydens lawyers , who are our sponsors , organises a free car through parramatta Toyota , for a player , and thier contract is registered 100k under its true value . Then that should be illegal. And I know it is already , but the penalties need to be severe . Like get a wooden spoon severe .
If the roosters have an extra 5 mil to spend on players , that’s fine as well . For every dollar over the 10 mil there is a 50% luxury tax , up to say 15mil hard cap . So in essence they have to pay 10mil for 5mul for f talent .
That money is then divided back into the clubs who are under the soft cap of 10 mil . If there’s 5 teams at 15 mil , then there’s 25 mil to divide through the other 12 teams .
It stops the whole “why should we be penalised for being better “ arguement , and allows weaker teams to use that money to prop thier team up , through salaries, junior development , coaches , whatever . And if they / us / we still suck at that point , there’s no where to hide . And it’s all transparent .
The players really only are revealing thier playing salary , so it’s not a huge privacy invasion , and stops all the crap .