@strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1360327) said:@jadtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1360304) said:@coastie_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1360301) said:@cctw said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1360079) said:@fingers83 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1359978) said:There is a hazy rumour floating around that Ricky Stuart has inquired about Luke Brooks availability to replace George Williams in Canberra.
Not sure on reliability, source has 50% hit rate. But one worth watching if it develops. By that I mean, watching Brooks out the door.
There was an enquiry by Wigan to see if they could get George Williams immediately and suggested a three way swap with Hastings moving to the Tigers, Brooks to Canberra and Williams to Wigan. I believe it was nothing more than an enquiry/suggestion which was shot down.
I wonder how much freight we'd expect to carry for Brooks still has a few years and on big $ which i cant see the raiders taking on. I think Brooks does need to go for his sake and our sake but to carry the can for this to happen would be silly especially when we've a;ready signed Hastings for next year.
Hastings is a downgrade from Brooks
The only people who even think brooks is crap , is the fans on social media , and Mick Ennis ( who has a bee in his bonnet because his close mate in Reynolds was wearing the magpies jersey last year ) There’s been no mention out of the club that they’re even remotely unhappy with him. I’m curious if he does play second receiver , how many try assists he will get . Or if he will prove everyone right on here .
Well if he kills at at 5/8. Which i think he is.
He will only prove he isn't a halfback (which he thinks he is) therefor almost everyone in the "Hook Brooks" camp will be correct.