@tigerwest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1439516) said:@jc99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1439511) said:@kelce68 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1439433) said:@russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1438226) said:@viking-warrior said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1438149) said:@russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1438087) said:@hsvjones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1437711) said:@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1437710) said:@boonboon said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1437707) said:@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1437705) said:@isaaktigers said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1437686) said:@tigervinnie said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1437667) said:@boonboon said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1437659) said:Interesting to note that not only is Brandon Smith off contract at the end of 2022 but Harry Grant actually has a Mutuak option for 2023 so if effectively off contract at the end of 2022 at this stage as well. I say go all in for Harry
last year showed having Grant in our team isn't priority and I would extend that to Smith as well.
We had Grant and still missed the finals terribly, we have far more important areas to fill before throwing marquee money at Hooker.
Without Grant we’d be last.
But seriously, I’d throw 1Milly at Grant. Even 1.1..
The influence and everything he had on the whole of Wests Tigers, I actually never felt or seen that effect a player can do to a team.
What do you do with the two capable hookers we presently have?
The 19 yr old nsw cup player or the injury riddled bloke who missed 8 tackles vs the Warriors and left dummy half empty and tjrows a bunch of average passes. You give them to someone else snd take the Origin star
Too bad the tigers have re-signed Liddle.
Only for 2 years and Grant would not leave the Storm until 2023 anyway.
You could offload Liddle pretty easy I reason and Simpkin could be a super sub / back up.
Or you could get rid of Simpkin and keep the better hooker at only 24.
Lol ? or get rid of the guy who can't play 80 minutes and misses 6 tackles and throws passes around ankles. At least Simpkin is still developing. Simpkin will be an 80 min hooker
At this stage Simpkin is below average - will he ever get above the mediocrity line....who knows. Anyone can play 80 mins Mate. It is how you play the eighty minutes. The games I saw Simpkin play in the NRL, he was not an 80 minute player either.
I think I would get rid of the guy who also can't play 80 minutes, stands with his hands on his hips after he passes the ball, hogs the ball in try scoring situations, slow as a wet week, no experience and couldn't tackle a decent size sandwich.
This is possibly the worst take on any up and coming player I have ever read.
Russell loves Liddle so much he literally said he'd have him over Harry Grant
I’d keep the 2 hookers we have atm, as well. They do the job and wouldn’t cost the earth to keep, unlike Harry probably will?
I think we have more pressing positions to cover before we worry about the 9.
I think 9 is a big issue. We need players in other positions more but your hooker touches the ball more than anyone and currently we don't have a decent one.
I think Jake Simpkin will come good but he's still so young and Liddle is struggling big time. Our service and direction from hooker is lacking and that's one of the reasons our attack is so slow.