yeahcaz
Well-known member
@gregjm87 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492349) said:@yeahcaz said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492328) said:@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492317) said:@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492141) said:I just think we should invest in our juniors like simpkin and invest hard let blokes like liddle go to another club sure he may flourish under a new coach but long term success wise we benefit from keeping simpkin and bringing in talent like Hodgson and bringing up our young boys like simpkin like Rua and Scolari
I don't understand the hate for Liddle. Can anyone explain where this comes from? And not just "I reckon ".... facts please. I see a capable dummy half who has exploded clear for try's on several occasions and managed a reasonable pack to positive metreage on most occasions. Please explain any improvement you can see with the signing of another hooker. People on here were screaming for Simpkin to be given a go until he was given a go, We saw how that turned out.
I think the club look at Starling in Canberra, a very similar dummy half to Simpkin and hope in a 2 year deal, Hodgson can have the same impact on him. Starling been one of the best young hookers in the game the last season and a half
Is there any evidence that Hodgson actually did anything for Starling's game?
Raiders have handled his development really well since they’ve had him. Giving him those 20-30 minute spells while Hodgson remains on the field has basically given him the starting 9 role at Canberra and a brand new deal.
There’s not a doubt in my mind Hodgson has aided his development as they’d no doubt have a bond and extra chats sharing the same role.