Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@gregjm87 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492349) said:
@yeahcaz said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492328) said:
@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492317) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492141) said:
I just think we should invest in our juniors like simpkin and invest hard let blokes like liddle go to another club sure he may flourish under a new coach but long term success wise we benefit from keeping simpkin and bringing in talent like Hodgson and bringing up our young boys like simpkin like Rua and Scolari

I don't understand the hate for Liddle. Can anyone explain where this comes from? And not just "I reckon ".... facts please. I see a capable dummy half who has exploded clear for try's on several occasions and managed a reasonable pack to positive metreage on most occasions. Please explain any improvement you can see with the signing of another hooker. People on here were screaming for Simpkin to be given a go until he was given a go, We saw how that turned out.

I think the club look at Starling in Canberra, a very similar dummy half to Simpkin and hope in a 2 year deal, Hodgson can have the same impact on him. Starling been one of the best young hookers in the game the last season and a half

Is there any evidence that Hodgson actually did anything for Starling's game?

Raiders have handled his development really well since they’ve had him. Giving him those 20-30 minute spells while Hodgson remains on the field has basically given him the starting 9 role at Canberra and a brand new deal.

There’s not a doubt in my mind Hodgson has aided his development as they’d no doubt have a bond and extra chats sharing the same role.
 
@willow said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492332) said:
The fact is, the club needs some leadership among the playing group and Hodgson provides that, whilst strengthening a position we are weak in. Now it's just a question of how much the Raiders chip in for next season.

Whilst it has been frustrating to watch the media spin repeated articles on the WT ability to recruit, you can't blame the club for being selective and not wasting cash - we hold the cards with respect to Hodgson as the Raiders cap is very strained. I wouldn't be surprised if we get him at a similar price to Peachy for 2 years, which IMO is a good deal.

Would also be good seeing Canberra cap burn.
 
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492314) said:
Josh is on 700k at the moment i would say Canberra would chip in a fair chunk of it to ship him hopefully this is the start of what Canberra had when they signed a few English boys

The SMH reckon close to 900k. (Yes, I know these estimates are often deliberate lies by the club.)
 
@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492326) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492323) said:
@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492317) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492141) said:
I just think we should invest in our juniors like simpkin and invest hard let blokes like liddle go to another club sure he may flourish under a new coach but long term success wise we benefit from keeping simpkin and bringing in talent like Hodgson and bringing up our young boys like simpkin like Rua and Scolari

I don't understand the hate for Liddle. Can anyone explain where this comes from? And not just "I reckon ".... facts please. I see a capable dummy half who has exploded clear for try's on several occasions and managed a reasonable pack to positive metreage on most occasions. Please explain any improvement you can see with the signing of another hooker. People on here were screaming for Simpkin to be given a go until he was given a go, We saw how that turned out.

Defense.

He tops the tackle count every week. What's your point?

Wouldn’t knock the skin off a custard
 
@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492317) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492141) said:
I just think we should invest in our juniors like simpkin and invest hard let blokes like liddle go to another club sure he may flourish under a new coach but long term success wise we benefit from keeping simpkin and bringing in talent like Hodgson and bringing up our young boys like simpkin like Rua and Scolari

I don't understand the hate for Liddle. Can anyone explain where this comes from? And not just "I reckon ".... facts please. I see a capable dummy half who has exploded clear for try's on several occasions and managed a reasonable pack to positive metreage on most occasions. Please explain any improvement you can see with the signing of another hooker. People on here were screaming for Simpkin to be given a go until he was given a go, We saw how that turned out.

No issue with Liddle in the squad here. I think he is a great running 14, solid enough in other aspects of the game.

He is not an 80 minute hooker at NRL level yet, and his service can be patchy. It is hard to say more than "I reckon" as I've never seen a stat for crispness of delivery from DH. They should invent one though. I'd keep him and give Simpkin 12 more months, but if he is white anting at all he has to go (have only seen rumours of it here).

2 things we lack that this switch addresses. Guys that buy into a better culture, and that means playing at 100% irrespective of the coach. And the second is leaders who understand success.

Hodgson is not perfect, but in these 2 areas he is a slight upgrade at worst.

Now we need 1, preferably 2 fast outside backs, and 1 very angry, ugly, stinky forward.
 
Hodgson signing is fantastic imo, people forget he has a brilliant kicking game out of hooker that we have lacked since farah, takes some stress off the halves.
 
@tsupps05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492380) said:
Hodgson signing is fantastic imo, people forget he has a brilliant kicking game out of hooker that we have lacked since farah, takes some stress off the halves.

Good for a one on one strip most weeks
 
@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492326) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492323) said:
@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492317) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492141) said:
I just think we should invest in our juniors like simpkin and invest hard let blokes like liddle go to another club sure he may flourish under a new coach but long term success wise we benefit from keeping simpkin and bringing in talent like Hodgson and bringing up our young boys like simpkin like Rua and Scolari

I don't understand the hate for Liddle. Can anyone explain where this comes from? And not just "I reckon ".... facts please. I see a capable dummy half who has exploded clear for try's on several occasions and managed a reasonable pack to positive metreage on most occasions. Please explain any improvement you can see with the signing of another hooker. People on here were screaming for Simpkin to be given a go until he was given a go, We saw how that turned out.

Defense.

He tops the tackle count every week. What's your point?

As Gould would say, Maybe he's high in the tackle count because they're not afraid to run at him.

I'm not writing Liddle off, but any smart coach would see that his attack and defence both deteriorate when he does a lot of work. Might be fitter after a good off-season, but I'm not confident. Peach could be good cover for him if he can't play 80.
 
@conepuncher said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492350) said:
@Demps please accept my sincere apologies for the naysaying. I believe I am owed an "I told you so".

Haha 😉

Credit to the source of information which all stems back to @willow

Let's not celebrate until it's official tho.
🍾 👑🔥
 
@masterton said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492383) said:
@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492326) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492323) said:
@tigerballs said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492317) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492141) said:
I just think we should invest in our juniors like simpkin and invest hard let blokes like liddle go to another club sure he may flourish under a new coach but long term success wise we benefit from keeping simpkin and bringing in talent like Hodgson and bringing up our young boys like simpkin like Rua and Scolari

I don't understand the hate for Liddle. Can anyone explain where this comes from? And not just "I reckon ".... facts please. I see a capable dummy half who has exploded clear for try's on several occasions and managed a reasonable pack to positive metreage on most occasions. Please explain any improvement you can see with the signing of another hooker. People on here were screaming for Simpkin to be given a go until he was given a go, We saw how that turned out.

Defense.

He tops the tackle count every week. What's your point?

As Gould would say, Maybe he's high in the tackle count because they're not afraid to run at him.

I'm not writing Liddle off, but any smart coach would see that his attack and defence both deteriorate when he does a lot of work. Might be fitter after a good off-season, but I'm not confident. Peach could be good cover for him if he can't play 80.

He’s like many of our players, too good for reggies but they’ll get you to 13th place.
 
@tsupps05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492380) said:
Hodgson signing is fantastic imo, people forget he has a brilliant kicking game out of hooker that we have lacked since farah, takes some stress off the halves.

IMHO, the main advantage of Hodgson is the pressure he would take off our halves.
 
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492390) said:
@tiger-woods said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492389) said:
The last time we had a Hodgson in the team we won the comp ? ? ?

No we didn't

Brett?
 
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492390) said:
@tiger-woods said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492389) said:
The last time we had a Hodgson in the team we won the comp ? ? ?

No we didn't


Brett Hodgson mate in 2005
I think he was also the top point scorer that year
Can somebody confirm
 
@tiger-woods said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492392) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492390) said:
@tiger-woods said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492389) said:
The last time we had a Hodgson in the team we won the comp ? ? ?

No we didn't


Brett Hodgson mate in 2005
I think he was also the top point scorer that year
Can somebody confirm

Yes he was
 
@demps said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492391) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492390) said:
@tiger-woods said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492389) said:
The last time we had a Hodgson in the team we won the comp ? ? ?

No we didn't

Brett?


Spot on buddy
We haven’t made the finals for so long even our beloved fans have forgotten that we won a comp ?
 
@demps said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492384) said:
@conepuncher said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492350) said:
@Demps please accept my sincere apologies for the naysaying. I believe I am owed an "I told you so".

Haha ?

Credit to the source of information which all stems back to @willow

Let's not celebrate until it's official tho.
? ??

Agree ... Until its announced I will hold my Beer.
I like the fact he bring knows how to control a game and can kick well from dummy half.. Fingers crossed
 

Latest posts

Back
Top