Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[the_third]

I understand the need for corporate confidentiality and no doubt you are well aware a supporter is not privy to that information. I also understand the posts on this forum which attempt to link a player signing with the club to the coach's tenure are divisive and unprofessional. Let the coach's fate be determined by results.

its in the media - public domain. kudos for a response

 

[Demps]

I remember a few years ago the general gist from players is they wanted to play for Madge, but they didn't want to play for the Wests Tigers at the time. Now that we have become a bit more stable, players are showing their interest.

Weeding out the trouble makers.

Liddle has been tapped on the shoulder, which just leaves Luke...

Hopefully we see him shown the door at seasons end as well.

With the Adam taking that 6 jersey and the (C)

 

[pawsandclaws1]

its in the media - public domain. kudos for a response

Employee reviews in my years of employment are confidential, for a good reason.

 

[the_third]

like I said its in the media, despite your pleas for confidentiality

 

[Telltails]

A coach can only achieve results based on the resources the club provides. Attributing all results at the hand of the coach - winning or losing - will never ensure success.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Weeding out the trouble makers.

Liddle has been tapped on the shoulder, which just leaves Luke...

Hopefully we see him shown the door at seasons end as well.

With the Adam taking that 6 jersey and the (C)

So you have suggested Liddle and Brooks are alleged trouble makers. As a supporter, I'd like your explanation?

 

[weststigerman]

Breaking news to some who don't know but sheens and madge work TOGETHER when it comes to recruitment of players

But but that means people can’t blame Madge for the bad and praise Sheens for the good.

 

[Demps]

So you have suggested Liddle and Brooks are trouble makers. As a supporter, I'd like your explanation?

Word on the street...

Heard whispers the Liddle fam do not like Madge and have heard from people I would trust that he has slandered Madge.

Bit more speculation around Brooks - but there has been similar rumours, other accusations I won't post publicly.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

like I said its in the media, despite your pleas for confidentiality

Pleas for confidentiality? 101 where I have worked, including Defence.

 

[Lee's fedora]

But but that means people can’t blame Madge for the bad and praise Sheens for the good.

Yep they work together to get the best possible players for the team

 

[the_third]

Pleas for confidentiality? 101 where I have worked, including Defence.

I dont care where you worked. like you dont care where I did/do. its in the public domain despite your pleas for confidentiality

 

[FinestTigers]

I am probably one of the most negative people on this forum, but I have seen enough change in our club this year to give Madge a go next year with a far better roster. Iam sure if the injury gods had been kinder and the likes of Sutton,Gee and a few others had been hit by a cement mixer we would be boarder line top 8 now.

Since the parra gane six weeks ago, We have actually looked much much better now than before then.

It would seem that Hastings is the biggest reason for the improvements but i would prefer to say that the team is a lot more composed now.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

I dont care where you worked. like you dont care where I did/do. its in the public domain despite your pleas for confidentiality

You can verify what in the public domain is correct?

 

[1eyedmel]

Agree 100% ..
This year we have had a whole different attitude and you can see it in the players.
I cannot recall a team having this many injuries like this (Roosters last year but they still had like 5 rep players still in the team due to no salary cap) and for what is left I think we are doing very well. I also think if we had a full team we would have won another 3-4 games.
Madge deserves to stay and play this out and if he doesn't perform next year with all the new quality players then move him on..
I vote for Madge like Hastings

Yes I forgot Hastings wrap on Madge as a coach and I think 9 games in under Madge I think says a lot about the coach in general, not to mention that Jacko would be keen to extend under our current coaching staff

 

[the_third]

You can verify what in the public domain is correct?

media with quotes? does that satisfy your criteria

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Word on the street...

Heard whispers the Liddle fam do not like Madge and have heard from people I would trust that he has slandered Madge.

Bit more speculation around Brooks - but there has been similar rumours, other accusations I won't post publicly.

There are lots of organisations where employees do not like one another (actually hate one another) but are considered professionals and are expected to work together for the good of the organisation. This is surprising especially when I watch Brooks who puts in for the team.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

media with quotes? does that satisfy your criteria

Who was quoted?

 

[the_third]

Who was quoted?

mate im not your EA ( not the battlefield guys) do some work yourself

 

[Lee's fedora]

To explain my point again players are coming to play FOR madge not just normal NRL players ELITE NRL players former premiership winners so why get rid of madge for