Lee's fedora
Well-known member
To explain my point again players are coming to play FOR madge not just normal NRL players ELITE NRL players former premiership winners so why get rid of madge for
Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion
- Thread starter MacDougall
- Start date
Lee's fedora
Well-known member
Its also pretty common knowledge that Liddle , Brooks and Mbye were the leaders of the anti madge system
pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
That is good and I appreciate your advice.
Update: Coaches rise and fall on results. I do not agree with linking player signings to the tenure of a coach at any club.
Last edited:
By the end of this season Paws I am going to get a compliment for Madge out of you. It is my new medium term goal. 😆
pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
You may not agree with a leader's methods, but you still contribute for the good of the Club. Brooks is a loyal player for WTs and Balmain. His on-field contribution has been outstanding for many years.
'If it weren't for the board'.. That could be said for the last 12 years of mediocrity.
Was the board being proactive and getting things more streamlined or were they being reactive and realising that maybe the coach can't coach the football team whilst overlooking the football department to a degree as well as pathways etc.
We honestly don't know how much Madge had on his plate the last two years.
I'm not defending him. He still needs to tick KPis, but I'm curious how much has his workload has decreased so that he can have more time for tactics and team selections.
Just curious is all because at the moment, Madge is starting to look happier. As well as the players.
Chinese whispers ha ha ha
he doesn't look like skelator at the pressers anymore
Roar_Power
Well-known member
Yeah well he isn't coming if Crichton's here 🙂
搞什么鬼
mikey
Well-known member
As P and C says Peformance reviews are confidential. Where I've worked if word got out about what was said in your performance review, it was generally known you were leaving yourself open to being taken to court.
There's a reason why so many are over the moon with Jackson Hastings this year.
As my man @The_Patriot said... he actually turns up, has a crack and does his job with pride.
Something we have not seen from our halfback in years.
yeah me too. Stuff the pedantic rubbish and read the media mate. Its a pretty naive comment to be fair
If you paid attention, others have also mentioned them...
User named the phantom or something who is friends with the Liddle family confirmed Jacob and his father were off Madge.
User named the phantom or something who is friends with the Liddle family confirmed Jacob and his father were off Madge.
While he has his faults no doubt..not having a crack is not one of Brooks faults..
What yesterday does highlight no matter how great Hastings was ..he can't do it alone..just as Brooks can't.. something we have know for years..
pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
I posted earlier in the day Hastings tried hard to spark the team yesterday. I respect his effort but he just does not have the pace or spark to get it done. However he brings other valuable qualities to the team. Brooks complements him with his spark, pace, kicking etc. As a combo, they work well together.
Jackson carries Brooks, yes.
Adam will prove to be the piece of the puzzle that makes Jackson's job easier and ignites the team in attack.
There were 17 all types of garbage that day.. 1 game is not a sample size..
pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
No. Brooks more than holds his own. That's why he is targeted by opposition teams because they know he is one of the few genuine threats WTs possess.
