pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
Employee reviews in my years of employment are confidential, for a good reason.its in the media - public domain. kudos for a response
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Employee reviews in my years of employment are confidential, for a good reason.its in the media - public domain. kudos for a response
So you have suggested Liddle and Brooks are alleged trouble makers. As a supporter, I'd like your explanation?Weeding out the trouble makers.
Liddle has been tapped on the shoulder, which just leaves Luke...
Hopefully we see him shown the door at seasons end as well.
With the Adam taking that 6 jersey and the (C)
But but that means people can’t blame Madge for the bad and praise Sheens for the good.Breaking news to some who don't know but sheens and madge work TOGETHER when it comes to recruitment of players
Word on the street...So you have suggested Liddle and Brooks are trouble makers. As a supporter, I'd like your explanation?
Pleas for confidentiality? 101 where I have worked, including Defence.like I said its in the media, despite your pleas for confidentiality
Yep they work together to get the best possible players for the teamBut but that means people can’t blame Madge for the bad and praise Sheens for the good.
I dont care where you worked. like you dont care where I did/do. its in the public domain despite your pleas for confidentialityPleas for confidentiality? 101 where I have worked, including Defence.
I am probably one of the most negative people on this forum, but I have seen enough change in our club this year to give Madge a go next year with a far better roster. Iam sure if the injury gods had been kinder and the likes of Sutton,Gee and a few others had been hit by a cement mixer we would be boarder line top 8 now.
You can verify what in the public domain is correct?I dont care where you worked. like you dont care where I did/do. its in the public domain despite your pleas for confidentiality
Yes I forgot Hastings wrap on Madge as a coach and I think 9 games in under Madge I think says a lot about the coach in general, not to mention that Jacko would be keen to extend under our current coaching staffAgree 100% ..
This year we have had a whole different attitude and you can see it in the players.
I cannot recall a team having this many injuries like this (Roosters last year but they still had like 5 rep players still in the team due to no salary cap) and for what is left I think we are doing very well. I also think if we had a full team we would have won another 3-4 games.
Madge deserves to stay and play this out and if he doesn't perform next year with all the new quality players then move him on..
I vote for Madge like Hastings
media with quotes? does that satisfy your criteriaYou can verify what in the public domain is correct?
There are lots of organisations where employees do not like one another (actually hate one another) but are considered professionals and are expected to work together for the good of the organisation. This is surprising especially when I watch Brooks who puts in for the team.Word on the street...
Heard whispers the Liddle fam do not like Madge and have heard from people I would trust that he has slandered Madge.
Bit more speculation around Brooks - but there has been similar rumours, other accusations I won't post publicly.
Who was quoted?media with quotes? does that satisfy your criteria
mate im not your EA ( not the battlefield guys) do some work yourselfWho was quoted?
That is good and I appreciate your advice.To explain my point again players are coming to play FOR madge not just normal NRL players ELITE NRL players former premiership winners so why get rid of madge for