pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 5, 2019
- Messages
- 13,516
That it hasn't been officially confirmed.What's Rumoured confirmed mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That it hasn't been officially confirmed.What's Rumoured confirmed mean?
See I like they keep stuff internally but I think that's bullocks.We were told today that the talk of Angus Crichton is over-stated in the media. Tigers have talked about him internally but not approached the player or his manager. Tigers think Isaiah Papali'i is the form second rower in the comp and are wary of paying much more for Crichton than the deal already done with IP. Also we have some strong development with junior backrowers e.g. Justin Matamua (who was re-signed this year).
Naden is 2022 Player #30. Very popular with the players esp his old mate Daine Laurie.
Liddle and Mikaele are free to explore their options elsewhere.
Nofo hasn't been selected because he failed concussion protocols again this week. He might be right next week.
Laurie and AD are close to returning, but we have the bye in Round 13 and club may choose to wait until after that. Club very wary about rushing the players back and risking re-injury.
Yeah but he's got to take a pay cut. They want him but not for nearly as much.I can't see the Chrichton question being answered soon. He was offered and accepted the roosters extension so I can imagine he will bide his time to see if it can work out at the roosters before seriously entertaining offers from other clubs - unless of course he has already been tapped on the shoulder.
You would have to think the club is being careful about maintaining relativities between players especially in similar playing positions. Crighton is an SOO player but Papali'i is an NZ international and an in-form second row forward. It would be hard to justify Crichton receiving more $.See I like they keep stuff internally but I think that's bullocks.
Roosters paid 800k for Crighton to come to the Roosters in the first place. If we are offering 700k for a 26 year old state of origin rep then it is sound business to me. If they lose out to another club because they won't give that 100k more then not sure what they are doing. I understand not to overpay players but he is worth around the 700k for what hel bring.
You would have to think the club is being careful about maintaining relativities between players especially in similar playing positions. Crighton is an SOO player but Papali'i is an NZ international and an in-form second row forward. It would be hard to justify Crichton receiving more $.
I understand but at the cost of a rep player. Just think add Crighton and another rep player with our already talented players and were on the way to the finals.You would have to think the club is being careful about maintaining relativities between players especially in similar playing positions. Crighton is an SOO player but Papali'i is an NZ international and an in-form second row forward. It would be hard to justify Crichton receiving more $.
I understand the enthusiasm to get Crichton but not at the expense of upset in the dressing shed because he is getting more $ than a more highly performed player in the same pos. He should want to come to WTs because we are WTs and play positive, attacking football with a strong defence. This is just my opinion.I understand but at the cost of a rep player. Just think add Crighton and another rep player with our already talented players and were on the way to the finals.
Except Gildart the club has been doing really well on the recruitment front so leave it in there hands.
Like to get this Dykes over here though. Seems to be have big wraps.
I can see bias against the Tigers when I want them to win and I can see bias for other teams when I have tipped or bet on them and want then to win.No offence but that's an odd statement.
Why are you dissing 12?A whole 12...
How many have made an NRL career in the last 10 years (Outside the few rattled off the other day)
There's no doubt there's kids in the SWS, There's no doubt there may be some coming through - Good Ones.
I'm really happy Gallant is involved - No one knows the lay out the land out there better than him.
But the old crap the area is ignored, And it's Wests Tigers fault there's no talent coming out of there in recent years - Is a load of absolute crap.
Wests Tigers have always done a decent job of getting out and about in the area, getting the talent out there into grades (Rua maybe a more recent one from memory)...
Could it be improved - Probably... Everything can be improved.
Players come through Juniors in Clumps, They always have....
The idea the area is neglected totally by the WT's is just garbage...
It was overstated in the media because WT rumour monger fans went totally overboard on all platforms and convinced them it was true.We were told today that the talk of Angus Crichton is over-stated in the media. Tigers have talked about him internally but not approached the player or his manager.
Hate to see that after more than 20 years as a joint venture that there is still a Magpies/Balmain thing going on.hate 2 pick at scabs but, Magpies are more there than Balmain
The reason AC hasn't had his Rorters extention ratified by the NRL is because they would have gone over the cap.
The fact that they were chasing Munster and now reports have come in that they want Cobbo makes AC still a target IMO.
We can't play overs though, after all this time trying to get out of Cap mess.
Get AC at a good price and probably have enough for someone else.
Except these days he is in the trenches less and less.You’d rather be in the trenches with Dale
But we have to spend the vast majority of the cap so we either sign some marquee players along the way or we pay overs for many periphery playersI'd like to think positively about this with the belief Sheens is working quietly behind the scenes to recruit good young players on the periphery of the NRL. That is where we get our bang for buck, not big name signings like Crichton. Utoikamanu and Laurie are shining examples.
What a bastard of a club though. Offer him a 2 year extension to keep a hold on him even though they know they can't get it ratified by NRL. Then go about getting all their ducks in a row to make big play for Munster and Cobbo. If they are a seroius chance of getting them AC.s extension will be off the table quicker than he can find a pen to sign it.I can't see the Chrichton question being answered soon. He was offered and accepted the roosters extension so I can imagine he will bide his time to see if it can work out at the roosters before seriously entertaining offers from other clubs - unless of course he has already been tapped on the shoulder.
AC can force the issue. It is not as though he will be left without options if the Roosters advise they cannot re-sign him yet because they have higher priorities.What a bastard of a club though. Offer him a 2 year extension to keep a hold on him even though they know they can't get it ratified by NRL. Then go about getting all their ducks in a row to make big play for Munster and Cobbo. If they are a seroius chance of getting them AC.s extension will be off the table quicker than he can find a pen to sign it.
I agree. Consider the annual cost of trying to support hundreds of kids playing every week, including rep matches, versus the annual cost of a single very well-funded recruitment unit within your club that scouts all districts.I would be interesting to undertake a comparison between WTs' investment in its junior districts to the investments made by Melbourne, Roosters and even the Broncos. I have the strong suspicion that it is much easier to pick the eyes out of the best juniors from those clubs which do invest in junior districts when you are spending next to nothing on your own districts (perhaps because they don't exist which is another issue).