@Eternal TigerI forget who but a poster on here who I had the impression was involved in kids rugby league said he was the best player for his age he'd ever seen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
@Eternal TigerI forget who but a poster on here who I had the impression was involved in kids rugby league said he was the best player for his age he'd ever seen.
Could not agree with you more!!!!!In the perfect world,
We extend Madden & release Brooks.
🔥💯
He touched the ball 3 times in the first 20 minutes for a knock on, a fumble/turnover and a first tackle kick that went no where. Add that to standing under a kick under the opposition goal posts and not bothering to compete for the ball. If you watched the game at all or even had a basic understanding of the game you wouldn't make this idiotic responses you're becoming famous for.Wow. And how many JD and cokes had you had prior to watching the game last week? Because that's the only way to explain how ridiculous that statement is. Unbelievable.
Re-watch the first half.He's done some good things since coming back.... Plenty of poor things.
I don't think he's been other worldly like his fangroup,
But he wasn't "terrible" last week - That's a bit of a stretch
Re-watch the first half.
He touched the ball 3 times in the first 20 minutes for a knock on, a fumble/turnover and a first tackle kick that went no where. Add that to standing under a kick under the opposition goal posts and not bothering to compete for the ball. If you watched the game at all or even had a basic understanding of the game you wouldn't make this idiotic responses you're becoming famous for.
Yeah, His first half wasnt his finest 40 but he was the difference in the second imo.Re-watch the first half.
AD second half was awesomeYeah, His first half wasnt his finest 40 but he was the difference in the second imo.
Yeah, His first half wasnt his finest 40 but he was the difference in the second imo.
he is fantastic at running the ball AD'S passing and ball playing is not his strength though unfortunatelyHis first half was terrible. He has been ordinary since coming back. His second half though showed how good he can be,
It should be put in context that when I state he has been ordinary since coming back that he is coming back from an ACL injury.
He is far from a complete player right now but if he gets his game together he will be some player.
he is fantastic at running the ball AD'S passing and ball playing is not his strength though unfortunately
he is fantastic at running the ball AD'S passing and ball playing is not his strength though unfortunately
He walked through from a set play. What else did he do you absolutely clueless dope. He got tackled about 3 times. That's it. If you think that's a good game you're a soccer fan. And who is a better centre than Garner you imbecile? Like I said, you have no clue about the game. Maybe you should start on the JD's and coke if that's your thing but you don't know anything about football so go join the Spice Girls forum where you might be able to convince someone you know what you're talking about.That’s adorable. You also conveniently leave out everything he did in the second half as it doesn’t align with your shit-for-brains stance. But that’s not surprising.
Basic understanding of the game? This coming from the fool who backs average pillows like Garner and claimed he was the best centre at the club? You wouldn’t understand the game even if it ran you over and kicked you in the balls.
Try swapping out the JD and cokes for water before watching games and maybe you’ll actually make it to a second half. Clown.
He walked through from a set play. What else did he do you absolutely clueless dope. He got tackled about 3 times. That's it. If you think that's a good game you're a soccer fan. And who is a better centre than Garner you imbecile? Like I said, you have no clue about the game. Maybe you should start on the JD's and coke if that's your thing but you don't know anything about football so go join the Spice Girls forum where you might be able to convince someone you know what you're talking about.
There you go, Kepoa clearly better than Garner. Go play with your dolls.So you didn't watch the second half. Right, so sealing the game with a try, Tackled three times? He made over 100m, breaking the line and looked a threat anytime he pretty much touched the ball, played a massive part in our third try by tapping the ball back after a Madden bomb then spreading it for Seyfarth then Toa to score? Need more, you dumb prick?
Kepaoa is clearly a better centre than Garner and if you can't see that, then you're an even bigger spastic then you've let on already.
You clearly don't know your ass from your elbow when it comes to footy. Try watching it sober for once and you might learn a thing or two. Dickhead.