Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

I am not a big fan of Sullivan as he comes across as a clown but he does have a Rock & Diamonds factor to him like Benji..

My biggest concern is his Hammies. Players with these injuries seem to have them a lot so fingers crossed.
 
I think that's fine price wise given the cap. Anyway, as long as you think he's going to increase on value, you should be able to offload without losing $$$ if needed. Doesn't have much downside risk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
IMG_0237.jpeg
I know many get frustrated when we see clubs like the dogs signing player after player, and we can seem quiet.

I’d rather quality signings over quantity. As you can see with many of the dogs signings moved on, they weren’t the right fit.

We have been guilty in the past of overreacting. I am more comfortable with the strategic approach. Players always fall out of other clubs, players will become available. I’d rather make sure we make the right decision, for the short and long term, rather than overreact, and tie our hands for any future movements.
 
I am not a big fan of Sullivan as he comes across as a clown but he does have a Rock & Diamonds factor to him like Benji..

My biggest concern is his Hammies. Players with these injuries seem to have them a lot so fingers crossed.

💯 needs to focus on his fitness, injury and body as no 1 focus. I'd invest heavily in himbto give him every chance to stay on the field and get to his best
 
Lol.. everyone is findin the positive in us signing an unproven kid who nobody else wanted, with a bad reputation for 4 years on $550K.

The ONLY good thing about this is that we can throw more mud at lee and justin when we all realise next year that we signed another lemon for 4 years.

has Mmbye, Packer, Reynolds taught us nothing?
The 3 you mention were proven duds on double what Sullivan is reported to be earning. With WT supporters crucifying every young player signing, any wonder why we have trouble attracting players to the club. So with the halves out there, who do you suggest we should have signed and for how much?
 
Going forward 2 spots as it stands for 2024.

Sezer & Staines would be good. Then definitely 1 x centre.

A trade for Olam would be awesome, maybe Naden for them?

Bula, Staines, To'a, Olam, Tupou, Fainu, Sezer, Utoiukamanu, Korosaui, Klemmer, Papali'i, Bateman, Blore, Sullivan, Pole, Twal, Fainu

Da Silva, Matamua.

& the rest
 
Can only assume that either his manager is an A grade negotiator, where we are not, or we were comfortable with locking him down for the same timeframe as Fainu.
But doesn’t that cause some issues in pathways coz I thought we had a good half down there, think it’s Gavin ? What happens there ?
I can’t see a problem with having too many halves of first grade level. If our young up and comer goes past the incumbent and the incumbent is still quality then you can always offload as trade bait to strengthen other positions (or maintain plenty of depth). If we somehow end up with too many quality halves then it’s a lot better position than we are in now.
 
Going forward 2 spots as it stands for 2024.

Sezer & Staines would be good. Then definitely 1 x centre.

A trade for Olam would be awesome, maybe Naden for them?

Bula, Staines, To'a, Olam, Tupou, Fainu, Sezer, Utoiukamanu, Korosaui, Klemmer, Papali'i, Bateman, Blore, Sullivan, Pole, Twal, Fainu

Da Silva, Matamua.

& the rest
Would be nice if we could pull,that off
 
Lol.. everyone is findin the positive in us signing an unproven kid who nobody else wanted, with a bad reputation for 4 years on $550K.

The ONLY good thing about this is that we can throw more mud at lee and justin when we all realise next year that we signed another lemon for 4 years.

has Mmbye, Packer, Reynolds taught us nothing?
There is plenty of positives in not having Wakeham/Brooks as our halves next year alone.

He could flop or he might work out okay. I’d rather see how he goes at WT before bagging him but that’s me.
 
There is plenty of positives in not having Wakeham/Brooks as our halves next year alone.

He could flop or he might work out okay. I’d rather see how he goes at WT before bagging him but that’s me.
You can’t blame people for being skeptical. We’ve seen this movie before, a hundred times over. Not since Scott Prince has a signing for us been a game changer. You could make a case for Ellis, but that’s it.
 
The 3 you mention were proven duds on double what Sullivan is reported to be earning. With WT supporters crucifying every young player signing, any wonder why we have trouble attracting players to the club. So with the halves out there, who do you suggest we should have signed and for how much?
I think we should’ve signed him for 2 yrs with our option for a third… and if he didn’t want that I wouldn’t sign him.

He’s unproven with a string of bad hamstrings.

Also he is not an organsing half

So we have him for 4 years and where does Fainu play? 6…

Sullivan is not a 7!

We are going to end up back where we were before with two #6s.

Even if sezer plays next year and the year after we still have two 6s lol - when we desperately need a 7.
 
Take a lap tigermate, let the people rejoice!
solid signing. Doesn't cost a lot. 3yrs + C.O.
Lol.

Dude.

We have two 6s long term.

Everyone knows we need a controlling half.

My issue is obvious sheens and benji seem sullivan and Fainu playing together when (if) Sezer finishes

Meaning they have learnt nothing that we need a controlling half

Both those guys are 6s.

It’s the same issue we have had since Robert Lui left
 
You can’t blame people for being skeptical. We’ve seen this movie before, a hundred times over. Not since Scott Prince has a signing for us been a game changer. You could make a case for Ellis, but that’s it.
It’s been a rough 12 years so yeah it’s not surprising, but I’d rather have some hope at least until April next year!
 
There is plenty of positives in not having Wakeham/Brooks as our halves next year alone.

He could flop or he might work out okay. I’d rather see how he goes at WT before bagging him but that’s me.
Mate everyone has said that about every signing at the tigers “give them a chance “ etc

We need a 7. Not a 6.

We have Fainu for 4 years.

Meaning at some point benji sees sullivan as a 7.

More dumb footy

Thank god they let hastings go !

If only we had a controlling half
 
Lol.

Dude.

We have two 6s long term.

Everyone knows we need a controlling half.

My issue is obvious sheens and benji seem sullivan and Fainu playing together when (if) Sezer finishes

Meaning they have learnt nothing that we need a controlling half

Both those guys are 6s.

It’s the same issue we have had since Robert Lui left

I understand your concerns bro...
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top