No what sets me off is if the club goes out and over spends to sign a marquee player some fans which I believe you are part of generally get on the attack stating the club has no idea and constantly waste cal space over paying players, but on the other hand if the club refuses to pay overs and misses out on signing a marquee player these same fans will attack the club for not being able to sign any marquee players.
So it becomes a no win situation in order for the club to please these fans I am talking about.
So that’s why I ask, would you be happy for the club to pay overs of approximately 1.2 million per season to sign someone like Bradman Best or would you prefer them to put the cheque book away and run with what we have or lesser players who will sign with us for a much cheaper price tag ?
If you want my opinion, it’s a flip of the coin as we no doubt need to sign a marquee player to lift everyone’s spirits, whether or not someone like Bradman Best is that right player it’s very hard to say as he’s young and who knows if he would reach his potential with us or not ?