851
Well-known member
Yeah why would we want him, some people really just have blinkers onWould fit in with the team of short outside backs we’re trying to build.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah why would we want him, some people really just have blinkers onWould fit in with the team of short outside backs we’re trying to build.
Unfortunately the only tall winger in the squad (Lobb) hasn't shown he's up to it. He had a pretty good game v Warriors during the trials but his dreadful game against the Sharks (they scored at least 3 tries due to his bad reads/errors) has sealed his fate, barring a catastrophic injury toll, he won't see 1st grade again any time soon.Would fit in with the team of short outside backs we’re trying to build.
Would fit in with the team of short outside backs we’re trying to build.
And the Roosters struggle with the Storm and Panthers, and the Panthers with 2 supposedly short wingers have won 3 premierships in a row.Unfortunately the only tall winger in the squad (Lobb) hasn't shown he's up to it. He had a pretty good game v Warriors during the trials but his dreadful game against the Sharks (they scored at least 3 tries due to his bad reads/errors) has sealed his fate, barring a catastrophic injury toll, he won't see 1st grade again any time soon.
I feel sorry for him as he was obviously injured (he could barely walk) & Benji didn't bench him when he clearly should have.
At least Tommy Talau had some height & could compete in the air, something that the Tigers have generally failed to do with so many vertically challenged wingers/centres over years.
When teams like the Roosters play the Tigers they just put up bombs to the corners on the 4th or 5th tackle knowing that their taller guys will (9 times out of 10) outleap our shorter defender and more likely than not score a try.
Manly 'master stroke' to end star's finals hoodoo https://www.nine.com.au/sport/nrl/t...gles-round-20-highlights-20240722-p5jvey.html
Under the right conditions Ravalawa is an upgrade to our wing stocks.
As has been pointed out already- we get terrible kick return/early set metres from our current players (hoping Lualili'i eventually is part of that solution). Ravalawa should help with that immediately.
If we can bring in a player that makes Charlie Staines a depth player instead of an automatic starter- that improves the club.
Strength and conditioning is the common problem through all our grades. Mistakes under fatigue, and we get physically dominated.Can’t be Sukkar or Tumeth problem because they were not there and the Cup side got flogged. I think Wests need to look at the real underlying issue here and it’s their defence and error rate. Until they fix that, there will be no improvement and they will yield the same results. They have changed players each week like nappies on a baby! No difference or change and it’s not the Coach.
No idea where you get 1% from.Improves the club 1 per cent …at this rate they will be back to 9th by 2030..under the “right conditions “…
Staines doesn't get enough good ball, he is under utilised in my honest opinion. He takes the ball up strongly when he comes infield to give the forwards a break.No idea where you get 1% from.
Fact is, Ravalawa adds something Staines etc do not.
Staines adds something Ravalawa does not.
What is more needed by the team at the moment?
I wouldn't go out of my way to add Ravalawa, but if we did- the extra 30-50m per game coming out of our own 20m area certainly puts the team in a better position. At the moment, our wingers have us starting tackle 4 inside our 30.
No idea where you get 1% from.
Fact is, Ravalawa adds something Staines etc do not.
Staines adds something Ravalawa does not.
What is more needed by the team at the moment?
I wouldn't go out of my way to add Ravalawa, but if we did- the extra 30-50m per game coming out of our own 20m area certainly puts the team in a better position. At the moment, our wingers have us starting tackle 4 inside our 30.
I quite like Staines. He adds that speed, as you pointed out. Plus he is a decent back-up fullback option as well.Staines doesn't get enough good ball, he is under utilised in my honest opinion. He takes the ball up strongly when he comes infield to give the forwards a break.
He is lightning fast, if he could get his hands on the ball more often and I mean good ball not hospital passes or passes below his knees or above his shoulders (like he seems to cop a lot) he and the team would be a lot more potent in attack.
He is also a damn good defender for his size especially considering he suffered that perforated bowel, others coming back from injuries haven't been as "brave" as he has, Adam Douehi is a good example.
Not sure if Ravalawa is the type of character we want to bring to the club when we all harp about low IQ players.No idea where you get 1% from.
Fact is, Ravalawa adds something Staines etc do not.
Staines adds something Ravalawa does not.
What is more needed by the team at the moment?
I wouldn't go out of my way to add Ravalawa, but if we did- the extra 30-50m per game coming out of our own 20m area certainly puts the team in a better position. At the moment, our wingers have us starting tackle 4 inside our 30.
Fair call.Well ..consider this …his current premiership winning coach that knows him a lot better than you or I doesn’t rate him …even though his best player at the position is walking out the door at the end of the season
The one percent was figurative of what I was saying earlier in the thread …is he better than Staines ? Probably…
is he a first grade player ? Well …his current coach doesn’t think so ..
So would it move the needle much next year if he joins ? I’m not sure it’s worth the hassle for him to take up a rare roster spot for not much of an improvement … I guess it depends if you want to move up gradually or not …
some might see moving up next year from 17th to 15th as an achievement …not sure that is going to help us retain Galvin next season ..which I think is the most crucial decision the club is facing in the next couple of years …
swing for the fences and buy a couple of established first graders
Before I get labelled as wanting Ravalawa at the club- certain conditions only. I wouldn't go out of my way to add him. But, if he was 'budget', if it was a short term contract, if it didn't get in the way of Lualili'i & Makasini getting into 1st grade & was for the purpose of adding something we don't have....he's an upgrade on Lobb.Not sure if Ravalawa is the type of character we want to bring to the club when we all harp about low IQ players.
He has built a bit of a rap sheet the past 18 months, drunken fight with a team mate earning a breach notice & then calling a female touch judge a c*** allegedly bringing a suspension.
Let's look at hard working, high effort, high IQ players.
At the moment we have a young inexperienced winger who is clearly not yet ready for NRL, he is about 5 foot 10 and struggles to catch or tackle.Improves the club 1 per cent …at this rate they will be back to 9th by 2030..under the “right conditions “…
I honestly thought he was older than 25!At the moment we have a young inexperienced winger who is clearly not yet ready for NRL, he is about 5 foot 10 and struggles to catch or tackle.
Ravalawa is a monster who is over 6 foot, weighs over 100kgs has played plenty of NRL, has a history of powerful ball running and scattering defenders, has a history of scoring plenty of tries, many that other wingers would not score.
He is 25y.o so should be in the prime of his career, he’s fast, carries no excess condition and has plenty of NRL experience.
As others have pointed out our forwards are struggling to do their job, therefore we desperately need backs who can carry the ball strongly out of our danger zone, Ravalawa does that.
What are our alternatives, everyone in our own system has been tried and failed or clearly not ready ?
Bailey Simonsson if we want a solid player with plenty of pace ?
Reimis Smith or Isaiah Tass if they are prepared to play predominantly as a winger ?
Taylan May if he gets cleared of criminal charges and the club is prepared to take a chance on him ? There is no doubt the Roosters won’t be concerned about what’s happened in the past if he gets cleared to play NRL again.
I just re-checked he’s 26, but still prime age for an NRL player.I honestly thought he was older than 25!
Fair call.
I think the argument that certain players fit needs more than others has to be taken into account.
According to this forum, Royce Hunt fixes losing Utoikamanu. Yet Royce Hunt doesn't get a guatenteed contract at the premiership challenging Sharks.
The Tigers generate low metre gains from the back 3. Ravalawa would 'most likely' go some way to improving that. I don't think Staines does.
I think, too often, the current success of a player in a system is all that is noted. Most players do not all of a sudden forget how to play. Adam Blair was the best backrower in the game at the Storm. Was awful at the Tigers. Then went back to being a premier forward at the Broncos.
His success at the Storm didn't make him a success at the Tigers, and his failure at the Tigers didn't make him a failure at the Broncos.
Ravalawa isn't a complete player. But he probably puts Luai in better field position to be Luai.
Ravalawa is a monster who is over 6 foot, weighs over 100kgs has played plenty of NRL, has a history of powerful ball running and scattering defenders, has a history of scoring plenty of tries, many that other wingers would not score.
He is 25y.o so should be in the prime of his career, he’s fast, carries no excess condition and has plenty of NRL experience.