Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

twentyforty said:
Apparently he’s signed until end of 27 on about $750k. I can’t see chooks tipping in much of that, due to his high demand.
Click to expand...
I reckon...and just opinion, that this cloud surrounding him drops his value significantly. Roosters want him gone and that alone shows motivation to do some deal.

500k would be an acceptable risk...we pay Doueihi 400k...we pay Taylan 600k...surely 500k is a reasonable value to output salary.

In saying that, we may be a club that distances ourselves from this type of drama, and Radley is not a young kid that would look up to the leaders...he is meant to be a leader or at least would be at our club...there's a lot to consider from a cultural standpoint.
 
weststigers said:
Apparently Radley is on 700k a season. It would be good business by the club to pick up his contract for 500k and add a missing piece to the team. He doesn't seem.like the kind of player to come to us though...seems like a bit of an Easttard...Manly next destination is my tip.
Click to expand...
Under current rules and these terms, id happily take him.
But it raises other issues around these situations. Should a player sacked by one club be able to go and simply sign elsewhere, given the behaviour clauses breached are the same at the new club?
In this situation Roosters are losing a player but we (or whoever) would be gaining one and likely at less than market value for his playing talent. It's possible (and has happened many times in the past) the sacked player ends up being paid more at the new club.
Is it right for the player to walk straight into a new position?
Is it right for the new club to get the talent on unders?
Is there anything that can be done about?
E.g. player can not receive more at new club and the contract value on the cap match what he was previously earning. I'm sure this would be a restraint of trade but just an idea.
This isn't me feeling sorry for roosters, just thinking about the whole situation.
 
mikey said:
Mixed feelings re the possibility. At his best very good enforcer and hard runner of the ball but he is close to the end. Don't want to end up wth another Bwaith type pension collector, which is a real possibility.
Click to expand...
Yeah fair call, however im sure hed offer 1000 times more impact than Anasta ever did.
 
Come on guys we have been saying for months that the next signing needs to be a damaging wild boar ploughing through the middle, what's changed.

We have cover until Doueihi can hold his own at lock over longer minutes, if that's who Benji wants at lock, who knows he may have other ideas to try over the summer.

Gut's telling me Benji won't be interested in Radley.
 
Camel2281 said:
Apart from Douehi not being proven defensively at lock and has played 2 games there in his career
Click to expand...
True but we have him contracted and earmarked for the position. It doesn’t make sense to go out and sign someone else who isn’t going to move the needle on the field and may negatively impact things off the field.
 
gregjm87 said:
Under current rules and these terms, id happily take him.
But it raises other issues around these situations. Should a player sacked by one club be able to go and simply sign elsewhere, given the behaviour clauses breached are the same at the new club?
In this situation Roosters are losing a player but we (or whoever) would be gaining one and likely at less than market value for his playing talent. It's possible (and has happened many times in the past) the sacked player ends up being paid more at the new club.
Is it right for the player to walk straight into a new position?
Is it right for the new club to get the talent on unders?
Is there anything that can be done about?
E.g. player can not receive more at new club and the contract value on the cap match what he was previously earning. I'm sure this would be a restraint of trade but just an idea.
This isn't me feeling sorry for roosters, just thinking about the whole situation.
Click to expand...
He's being released
 
Don't think radley would fit in with all the teetotallers here. Reckon the implications of Benjis family first approach is a pretty strict no drugs policy.
 
GCfan said:
I don’t know if Radleys got half arsing in him to be honest.
Click to expand...
Haha Till he puts a Tigers jumper on . He's a die hard rooster if they fuc.k him off ,well....He represents England I say go get a pay day , play half hearted and still look like a star in the superleague..Also he likes the Snow, plenty on snow over there 😜🤧
 
Anyone watching the school boys game to see how our 2 signings are going?

Also for those interested to see how Jock goes on Sunday.

1000005087.jpg
 
Rock Hopper Steve said:
Come on guys we have been saying for months that the next signing needs to be a damaging wild boar ploughing through the middle, what's changed.

We have cover until Doueihi can hold his own at lock over longer minutes, if that's who Benji wants at lock, who knows he may have other ideas to try over the summer.

Gut's telling me Benji won't be interested in Radley.
Click to expand...
Could Sione be that guy?
He's almost a victim of his versatility that he can play backrow, lock and prop..
 
weststigers said:
Apparently Radley is on 700k a season. It would be good business by the club to pick up his contract for 500k and add a missing piece to the team. He doesn't seem.like the kind of player to come to us though...seems like a bit of an Easttard...Manly next destination is my tip.
Click to expand...
Super league for a year with Rorters covering the $ difference than back to the rorters as a redemption story.
 
Radley is 3 or 4 years too late..has been a gr8 player,but hes finished..done and dusted ..he will just cost a desperate club a lot of $$ and disruption with a medical retirement.
Weve just been thru one of these and hopefully will have learnt something
Its a giant distraction..we have plenty already
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 238 (members: 3, guests: 235)
Back
Top