king_sirro
Well-known member
Agree...but Tannous Sukkar and Mason I'd flick.
Sukkar is great depth. Only very young, defends well and runs good lines. Id definitely be keeping him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree...but Tannous Sukkar and Mason I'd flick.
Reports are Parramatta told Lomax they don’t want him back.These Storm texts don’t look good for the NRL. I’m interested to know when they were sent, and then when PVL came out saying how it was important for Lomax to stay in the NRL. Corrupt assholes.
Reports are Parramatta told Lomax they don’t want him back.
If that is proven it would mean they are fighting tj block him playing elsewhere, but don’t want him themselves, that is very petty.
we'd fight to the death. Last man standing can decide on Sukkar. Deal?Sukkar is great depth. Only very young, defends well and runs good lines. Id definitely be keeping him
I hate Parra more than anyone, but they aren’t in the wrong here.Reports are Parramatta told Lomax they don’t want him back.
If that is proven it would mean they are fighting tj block him playing elsewhere, but don’t want him themselves, that is very petty.
Thumbs down for mine.BREAKING:
It can be now revealed:
Wayne Bennett’s method in luring Haas to the Rabbitohs.
Introducing his new self, Ali Bennett.
View attachment 33997
I deleted the post champion @Viva_ZapataThumbs down for mine.
They are however shaping for a better than petty season.Parra are a very petty club so it would not shock me if it was true.
It’s that very reason I think he wins his case. If he does win, not sure Parra would get any compensation.Reports are Parramatta told Lomax they don’t want him back.
If that is proven it would mean they are fighting tj block him playing elsewhere, but don’t want him themselves, that is very petty.
That could mean he should play in another code as per the whatever terms of his release.Reports are Parramatta told Lomax they don’t want him back.
If that is proven it would mean they are fighting tj block him playing elsewhere, but don’t want him themselves, that is very petty.
The reason PVL is on the side of Melbourne Storm on this issue.That could mean he should play in another code as per the whatever terms of his release.
It depends on the terms of his release given by the Eels. We can suggest a solution, that he is to immediately join Wests tigers on a 3-year contract.The reason PVL is on the side of Melbourne Storm on this issue.
Why should a player be forced to given another code just because the club he was contracted to is being petty.
Both low clubs the Eels and Bulldogs.
we'd fight to the death. Last man standing can decide on Sukkar. Deal?