Of course.clubs will be losing players they arent going to be a new team full of.locals....$4m covers a few playersWe should get more, if teams lose players they should be compensated per player.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course.clubs will be losing players they arent going to be a new team full of.locals....$4m covers a few playersWe should get more, if teams lose players they should be compensated per player.
We will know for sure in 3 weeks
IMO I think the May brothers and Turuva will follow but I hope not.
It's just too good of money to knock back and I don't blame them.
I hope we start extending some asap now to settle the ship
Government's can change whatever legislation they want - and will do if there's enough public interest in doing so. I'm don't think that $600M of Australian taxpayers money to subsize a sport is good value. If they want to subsidize Australian sport then give the funds to the AOC not some competition in some corrupt 3rd world country.I doubt Albo is losing the next election .. but there is currently bi partisan support for this PNG team ..
Can I ask if you feel sick about $600m …how do you feel about spending $300 BILLION on lnuclear submarines ?
Government's can change whatever legislation they want - and will do if there's enough public interest in doing so. I'm don't think that $600M of Australian taxpayers money to subsize a sport is good value. If they want to subsidize Australian sport then give the funds to the AOC not some competition in some corrupt 3rd world country.
In isolation, this isn't a big deal.
If they pillage our club and we are left decimated while all the fringe guys get swallowed up with tax free money incentives as well, it really makes it hard to replace your losses.
I agree..it doesn't change what is happening now, but if PNG are now first choice, only one club gets to compete for the best players at ALL LEVELS....even a young up and comer would likely pick PNG to cash in and set themselves up.Yes ..this is true ..
We won’t know though if this will happen for 6 months or more …in the meantime everyone may as well enjoy our best season in 15 years
Very funny, you worry about corruption but want to give money to the AOC. How about FIFA and the IOC while we are at it? Always money well spentGovernment's can change whatever legislation they want - and will do if there's enough public interest in doing so. I'm don't think that $600M of Australian taxpayers money to subsize a sport is good value. If they want to subsidize Australian sport then give the funds to the AOC not some competition in some corrupt 3rd world country.
That's unfair say if one team loses 6 players to the expansion clubs while others lose only one or even no players.Of course.clubs will be losing players they arent going to be a new team full of.locals....$4m covers a few players
With 1.2 million freed up for 2028 and several of our key players (May brothers, Samuela and Latu) being off contract, no reason we shouldn’t be an in the drivers seat to retain them. Hell, Knights just re-signed Ponga.
By Terrell’s own account, his extension was all but signed and has been forgotten (if true, Shaun should be fired). And that’s with PNG already in the mix. If we can get Terrell sorted, Taylan will more than likely follow.
I don’t see any of the Fainu boys going anywhere with Benji as coach, Sione already signed long term and Latu about to be handed the keys with Luai leaving.
funding it is locked in for 10 years re pngGovernment's can change whatever legislation they want - and will do if there's enough public interest in doing so. I'm don't think that $600M of Australian taxpayers money to subsize a sport is good value. If they want to subsidize Australian sport then give the funds to the AOC not some competition in some corrupt 3rd world country.
We wont lose 6...heck i dont think there has ever been a.player exodus worse than the Magpies losing 5 in 1980...thatll be almost 50 years .That's unfair say if one team loses 6 players to the expansion clubs while others lose only one or even no players.
Teams that have a lot of players coming off contract, like Wests Tigers are the teams going to be hit hardest, especially if it's led by one of their marquis players leaving, causing some of his team mates to follow.
That's the feeling I got out of all of this and the press conference with Benji. The way the team has evolved is we dont have anyone really dominating and winning games for us, that means no real marquee players however more players on above average money....Luai's input on field compared to his wage is an obvious outlier.Does anyone else have a feeling that Benji feels Jerome hasn't been worth the 1.2m price tag and this has been a very mutual decision?
Benji is hard to read. doesn't give much away. Jerome leaving does releave Benji of some tough decisions with the weekly selection principles he has set.Does anyone else have a feeling that Benji feels Jerome hasn't been worth the 1.2m price tag and this has been a very mutual decision?