So let's examine that. I rewatched the first half just to be sure.
The poor kick happened.
The "hospital ball" is embellishment and hyperbole. Didn't happen as described.
Wingers and centres jam in to cut off plays multiple times every game. It isn't an unusual thing, even AD has done it several times for us this year.
Defensive errors? That's where your agenda is exposed. His defence was superb. Qld ran at his edge all first half and he consistently jammed in and shut down the attack. He was faultless. The ball inside the touchline that led to their try resulted after he was the only Blue that tried to cut off the inside ball, leaving him an impossible tackle.
A couple of effort plays? He had to be dummy half for the first 2 play the balls of every set because Robson was walking. He was everywhere, and you dismiss that as " a couple of effort plays".
He also created space an opportunities for Lattrell getting him one on one consistently.
A couple of passes missing the target? There was one where Jarome saw that his planned receiver was covered and chose to go out the back to Lomax, who wasn't expecting it. That's on Lomax, if he attempts to catch the ball he scores. That was his only pass that went to ground
I've read your consistent bagging of Luai since he was signed, it's clearly based on a pre-existing bias.
It's why you make things up.
You truly have earned your title as the worst judge of football on the forum.
Congratulations.
Do better.
Haven't re-watched but;
Poor kick happened.
Poor passes happened. The one I can clearly recall was Shortly after the penalty goal to Qld when NSW were attacking the line shifted left and Luai threw it behind Mitchell (or in front of Crichton, not sure who he was trying to hit). Too ran back to clean up tried a shit kick and play broke down. I remember thinking that's 2 now at some point but can't now recall the 2nd one. Perhaps it's the pass intended for Lomax you highlighted.
Cotter ran straight through him for the break that led to what could have been a try to Hammer but Qld bombed it. Mitchell contributed heavily by getting up past the ball but still a poor attempted tackle. Luai and Mitchell looked disconnected most the half. Lots of easy metres and quick play the balls targeting the space between the 2.
Other smaller issues with his defence (admittedly a little nit picky but showing he was far from superb) he failed to shut down the play when jamming a couple times. The main example being the offload that led to Robson conceding the holding back penalty. This gave Qld the possession that led to their try.
Agree he was left stranded by the inside men not helping when the ball was flicked out the back when going into touch and at least he tried to contribute. But he was neither shutting off the pass or helping put the bloke out. He also switched off for a second prior to the ball being flicked out.
I haven't constantly bagged Luai since he was signed. I thought he was signed on overs, particularly at the time. As the season progressed last year he stepped up in Cleary's absence. I still thought slight overs but he did show an ability to lead the side that he had not previously shown at the time of signing him. But I also said he was potentially the circuit breaking signing the club needed and you weren't going to get him without paying overs. As such I didn't disagree with the signing even if I don't think he can actually perform to his price tag.
I've bagged the take that he is only hear because of Benji and what a good job Benji did to bring him here. I think this take ignores the contract he is on. Again happy for him to be here, just the blind Benji love that I disagree with.
Finally I actually liked Luai prior to being a Tiger (and still do for the record). I wasn't one who hated the bloke for being grubby or out of touch with fans then changed that stance to he's just passionate once his jersey changed. I don't believe I held any previous bias against him as a person or a player.
It's true I've been largely disappointed with what he has produced on field for the club whilst being very impressed with what he appears to be bringing off field.
I have critiqued what I believe his failings have been thus far but given I also acknowledge his achievements I don't think that is constant bagging. Similarly I can see that he was one of our best in the 2nd half. Doesn't mean he wasn't poor in the first half.