@willow said in [StatsInsider article on Wests Tigers](/post/1351306) said:
@elleryhanley said in [StatsInsider article on Wests Tigers](/post/1351112) said:
GREAT article...sums up all the things we have been saying.
Forwards are not getting meters...no variety in the pack...and the halves can't even see opportunities like Jake Granville stuck in the centers and go to his side. Low IQ footy and zero pack variety.
We either have a really bad team...
A really low IQ team...
Or a really bad coach...
Hard to tell at this stage.
Tuki and Blore may well change the entire pack and fix those problems...Madden hopefully would add some actual half back skills...let's see what happens, but that article clearly shows what is going wrong.
I'm going to say low IQ team, comes back to the halves directing the team around the park. One of our halves is mute come kick off...
Rugby league is a simple game. If you dissect every game this season into quarters, you’ll have an understanding of what separates the good from the bad. Here’s the truth..
The best teams have the best halves. Simple as that. You can quote that article re offloads etc but the primary influence is possession. Repeat sets ( momentum ) is almost the sole determining factor in winning games. Field position has an influence, but that seems to be more a product of possession, stats wise. The reason WT are down the scale in offloads is due to one factor and that is time with quality possession. Defences only ever have to work against us for six tackles. When that goes up to eighteen tackles, we are as effective with the ball as most other side. Unfortunately, this happens all too infrequently.
We were the better side against Souths because we were effective, somehow, in keeping the ball. Nearly all first grade footballers know how to play the game and when they have enough ball, they can compete. We looked good against Manly until they gained control of possession. It’s simply a game of time in possession, the most important factor being continual time in possession.
The other major factor is having at least ONE player who becomes the focal point of opposition defences. Plays are constructed around the influence of that player, whether that player is in possession or is a threat of taking possession, meaning that player can draw attention away from the actual threat. Daine Laurie is meant to be that for WT but has so far been insignificant. Basically, WT have not had the opportunity of multiple set possession often enough to either score points or defend in a physically sustainable manner.
Possession is key. That’s it. Constant pressure. We don’t have it.
You can refine this down to statistics and who isn’t doing what at any particular time, but it’s nothing more or less than quality time with the footy.